Legal Analysis on Interlink between International and National Instruments Towards Woman Rights in Indonesia

Q3 Social Sciences
Tri Prihatinah
{"title":"Legal Analysis on Interlink between International and National Instruments Towards Woman Rights in Indonesia","authors":"Tri Prihatinah","doi":"10.17304/IJIL.VOL8.4.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International instruments such as the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, the Internasional Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Agaist Women (CEDAW) have led to what has been called a juridical revolution. Under these international instruments, the idea of all these rights including woman rights has been constitutionalized in almost all countries and practically all countries are now committed internationally to respect and ensure the woman rights of their citizens. In this paper international instruments relating the woman rights and their domestic enforceability are covered. Using juridical-normative approach, we discuss the domestic enforceability of international woman rights in Indonesia. The result showed that although women are guaranteed equality under Indonesian Constitution, considerable gaps exist between de jure and de facto equality for women. When there is a conflict within a monist approach, Indonesia tends to follow a doctrine of national law primate. In a case of instruments conflict between woman rights at national/local instruments and international one, then international instument is put aside.","PeriodicalId":36998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17304/IJIL.VOL8.4.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

International instruments such as the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, the Internasional Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Agaist Women (CEDAW) have led to what has been called a juridical revolution. Under these international instruments, the idea of all these rights including woman rights has been constitutionalized in almost all countries and practically all countries are now committed internationally to respect and ensure the woman rights of their citizens. In this paper international instruments relating the woman rights and their domestic enforceability are covered. Using juridical-normative approach, we discuss the domestic enforceability of international woman rights in Indonesia. The result showed that although women are guaranteed equality under Indonesian Constitution, considerable gaps exist between de jure and de facto equality for women. When there is a conflict within a monist approach, Indonesia tends to follow a doctrine of national law primate. In a case of instruments conflict between woman rights at national/local instruments and international one, then international instument is put aside.
关于印度尼西亚妇女权利的国际和国家文书相互联系的法律分析
《世界人权宣言》、《公民权利和政治权利国际盟约》、《社会权利和文化权利国际盟约》以及《消除对妇女歧视公约》等国际文书导致了所谓的司法革命。根据这些国际文书,几乎所有国家都将包括妇女权利在内的所有这些权利的概念写入了宪法,实际上所有国家现在都在国际上承诺尊重和确保其公民的妇女权利。本文涵盖了与妇女权利有关的国际文书及其在国内的可执行性。使用司法规范的方法,我们讨论国际妇女权利在印度尼西亚的国内可执行性。结果表明,虽然印度尼西亚宪法保障妇女平等,但在法律上和事实上的妇女平等之间存在着相当大的差距。当一元论方法中存在冲突时,印度尼西亚倾向于遵循国家法律原则。在国家/地方文书与国际文书中妇女权利发生冲突的情况下,则搁置国际文书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信