A comparative performance analysis of LoRaWAN in two frequency spectra: EU868 MHz and 2.4 GHz

Riccardo Marini, Giampaolo Cuozzo
{"title":"A comparative performance analysis of LoRaWAN in two frequency spectra: EU868 MHz and 2.4 GHz","authors":"Riccardo Marini, Giampaolo Cuozzo","doi":"10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the latest years, LoRaWAN has emerged as a valid alternative to cellular technologies for Internet of Things applications, thanks to its long-range capabilities and high energy efficiency at the expense of a very limited bit rate. To support highly demanding applications, in 2017, Semtech released the first LoRa module working at 2.4 GHz, but the LoRaWAN protocol has not been updated to support such a version, despite the wider frequency channels available in this frequency portion. In this paper, we perform a quantitative analysis on the exploitation of this frequency spectrum in the currently released LoRaWAN version, comparing it with the standard EU868 MHz version. By means of extensive ad-hoc network simulations obtained with the open-source LoRaWANSim, we point out the main advantages of the 2.4 GHz version (e.g., higher throughput) and disadvantages (e.g., coverage issues), for both transmission directions, and as a function of different parameters, such as the number of devices, gateways, area size, and payload. Numerical results show that LoRaWAN at 2.4 GHz is a viable solution for scenarios characterized by a high density of nodes in a limited area, whereas LoRaWAN in the EU868 MHz spectrum remains the preferred choice when considering wide environments.","PeriodicalId":65870,"journal":{"name":"公共管理高层论坛","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"公共管理高层论坛","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the latest years, LoRaWAN has emerged as a valid alternative to cellular technologies for Internet of Things applications, thanks to its long-range capabilities and high energy efficiency at the expense of a very limited bit rate. To support highly demanding applications, in 2017, Semtech released the first LoRa module working at 2.4 GHz, but the LoRaWAN protocol has not been updated to support such a version, despite the wider frequency channels available in this frequency portion. In this paper, we perform a quantitative analysis on the exploitation of this frequency spectrum in the currently released LoRaWAN version, comparing it with the standard EU868 MHz version. By means of extensive ad-hoc network simulations obtained with the open-source LoRaWANSim, we point out the main advantages of the 2.4 GHz version (e.g., higher throughput) and disadvantages (e.g., coverage issues), for both transmission directions, and as a function of different parameters, such as the number of devices, gateways, area size, and payload. Numerical results show that LoRaWAN at 2.4 GHz is a viable solution for scenarios characterized by a high density of nodes in a limited area, whereas LoRaWAN in the EU868 MHz spectrum remains the preferred choice when considering wide environments.
LoRaWAN在EU868 MHz和2.4 GHz两个频谱下的性能对比分析
近年来,LoRaWAN已成为物联网应用中蜂窝技术的有效替代方案,这要归功于其远程功能和高能效,但代价是非常有限的比特率。为了支持高要求的应用,Semtech在2017年发布了第一个工作在2.4 GHz的LoRa模块,但尽管在该频率部分有更宽的频率通道,但LoRaWAN协议尚未更新以支持该版本。在本文中,我们对当前发布的LoRaWAN版本中该频谱的利用进行了定量分析,并将其与标准的EU868 MHz版本进行了比较。通过使用开源的LoRaWANSim获得的广泛的自组织网络模拟,我们指出了2.4 GHz版本的主要优点(例如,更高的吞吐量)和缺点(例如,覆盖问题),对于两个传输方向,以及作为不同参数的函数,如设备数量,网关,区域大小和有效载荷。数值结果表明,2.4 GHz的LoRaWAN在有限区域内节点密度高的情况下是一种可行的解决方案,而在考虑宽环境时,EU868 MHz频谱的LoRaWAN仍然是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信