Morphological and Clinical Predictors of Early/Follow-up Failure of the Endovascular Infrarenal Abdominal Aneurysm Repair With Currently Available Endografts.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1177/15266028231158312
Enrico Gallitto, Gianluca Faggioli, Chiara Mascoli, Martina Goretti, Rodolfo Pini, Antonino Logiacco, Cristina Rocchi, Francesca Feroldi, Stefania Caputo, Mauro Gargiulo
{"title":"Morphological and Clinical Predictors of Early/Follow-up Failure of the Endovascular Infrarenal Abdominal Aneurysm Repair With Currently Available Endografts.","authors":"Enrico Gallitto, Gianluca Faggioli, Chiara Mascoli, Martina Goretti, Rodolfo Pini, Antonino Logiacco, Cristina Rocchi, Francesca Feroldi, Stefania Caputo, Mauro Gargiulo","doi":"10.1177/15266028231158312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report outcomes of endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with currently-available endografts and identify predictors of technical/clinical failure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing EVAR between 2012 and 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Technical success (TS: no type I-III endoleaks, renal/hypogastric arteries loss, iliac leg occlusion, conversion to open repair and mortality within 24 postoperative hour), proximal neck-related TS (nr-TS: no proximal type I endoleaks, unplanned renal arteries coverage), and 30-day mortality were assessed as early outcomes. Proximal type I endoleak (ELIa), survival and freedom from reinterventions (FFRs) were assessed during follow-up. Uni/multivariate analysis and Cox-regression were used to identified factors associated with early and follow-up outcomes; FFR and survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 710 were included. Technical success and nr-TS were 692 (98%) and 700 (99%), respectively. The presence of ≥2 hostile anatomical infrarenal neck characteristics was associated with technical failure (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-4.1; p: 0.007). Infrarenal neck angle >90° (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 9.6-50.3; p: 0.004), barrel shape (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 11.1-100.3; p: 0.02) or presence of ≥2 hostile anatomical infrarenal neck characteristics (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 2.5-5.3; p: 0.03) were independent risk factors for neck-related technical failures. Six (0.8%) patients died within 30 postoperative days. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 16; 95% CI: 1.1-218.3; p: 0.04) and urgent repair (OR: 15; 95% CI: 1.8-119.6; p: 0.01) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The mean follow-up was 53±13 months. There were 12 (1.7%) ELIa during follow-up. Infrarenal neck length <15 mm (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.9-9.6; p: 0.005), diameter >28 mm (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.6-9.5; p: 0.006), angle ≥90° (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 8.3-50.1; p: 0.007), and persistent type II endoleak (HR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.6-10.1; p: 0.004) were independent risk factors for ELIa. Freedom from reintervention was 91% at 5 years. The ELIa was an independent risk factor for reinterventions during follow-up (HR: 29.5; 95% CI: 1.4-1.6; p<0.001). Survival was 74% at 5 years with 2 cases (0.3%) of late aortic-related mortality. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (HR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.4-3.65; p: 0.03), aneurysm diameter ≥65 mm (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4-3.26; p<0.001), and infrarenal neck length <15 mm (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.35; p: 0.04) were independent risk factors for mortality during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular repair with currently-available endografts has high TS and low 30-day mortality. Survival and FFRs were satisfactory at mid-term. Pre/postoperative risk factors for technical and clinical failure were identified and they should be considered in EVAR indication and postoperative management to reduce complications and improve mid-term outcome.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Pre and postoperative risk factors for technical and clinical EVAR failure can be identified and they should be considered in EVAR indication and postoperative management to reduce complications and improve mid-term outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1130-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231158312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report outcomes of endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with currently-available endografts and identify predictors of technical/clinical failure.

Materials and methods: Patients undergoing EVAR between 2012 and 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Technical success (TS: no type I-III endoleaks, renal/hypogastric arteries loss, iliac leg occlusion, conversion to open repair and mortality within 24 postoperative hour), proximal neck-related TS (nr-TS: no proximal type I endoleaks, unplanned renal arteries coverage), and 30-day mortality were assessed as early outcomes. Proximal type I endoleak (ELIa), survival and freedom from reinterventions (FFRs) were assessed during follow-up. Uni/multivariate analysis and Cox-regression were used to identified factors associated with early and follow-up outcomes; FFR and survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 710 were included. Technical success and nr-TS were 692 (98%) and 700 (99%), respectively. The presence of ≥2 hostile anatomical infrarenal neck characteristics was associated with technical failure (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-4.1; p: 0.007). Infrarenal neck angle >90° (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 9.6-50.3; p: 0.004), barrel shape (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 11.1-100.3; p: 0.02) or presence of ≥2 hostile anatomical infrarenal neck characteristics (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 2.5-5.3; p: 0.03) were independent risk factors for neck-related technical failures. Six (0.8%) patients died within 30 postoperative days. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 16; 95% CI: 1.1-218.3; p: 0.04) and urgent repair (OR: 15; 95% CI: 1.8-119.6; p: 0.01) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The mean follow-up was 53±13 months. There were 12 (1.7%) ELIa during follow-up. Infrarenal neck length <15 mm (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.9-9.6; p: 0.005), diameter >28 mm (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.6-9.5; p: 0.006), angle ≥90° (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 8.3-50.1; p: 0.007), and persistent type II endoleak (HR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.6-10.1; p: 0.004) were independent risk factors for ELIa. Freedom from reintervention was 91% at 5 years. The ELIa was an independent risk factor for reinterventions during follow-up (HR: 29.5; 95% CI: 1.4-1.6; p<0.001). Survival was 74% at 5 years with 2 cases (0.3%) of late aortic-related mortality. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (HR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.4-3.65; p: 0.03), aneurysm diameter ≥65 mm (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4-3.26; p<0.001), and infrarenal neck length <15 mm (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.35; p: 0.04) were independent risk factors for mortality during follow-up.

Conclusion: Endovascular repair with currently-available endografts has high TS and low 30-day mortality. Survival and FFRs were satisfactory at mid-term. Pre/postoperative risk factors for technical and clinical failure were identified and they should be considered in EVAR indication and postoperative management to reduce complications and improve mid-term outcome.

Clinical impact: Pre and postoperative risk factors for technical and clinical EVAR failure can be identified and they should be considered in EVAR indication and postoperative management to reduce complications and improve mid-term outcome.

使用现有内移植物进行血管内肾下腹腔动脉瘤修补术早期/后续失败的形态学和临床预测因素
目的:报告使用目前可用的内植物对肾下腹主动脉瘤(AAA)进行血管内修复(EVAR)的结果,并确定技术/临床失败的预测因素:对2012年至2020年间接受EVAR手术的患者进行前瞻性收集和回顾性分析。技术成功率(TS:无 I-III 型内膜渗漏、肾动脉/腹股沟动脉缺失、髂腿闭塞、术后 24 小时内转为开放式修复和死亡)、近端颈部相关 TS(nr-TS:无近端 I 型内膜渗漏、计划外肾动脉覆盖)和 30 天死亡率作为早期结果进行评估。随访期间评估了近端I型内漏(ELIa)、存活率和免再介入(FFR)。采用单变量/多变量分析和 Cox 回归确定与早期和随访结果相关的因素;采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估 FFR 和存活率:结果:共纳入710例患者。结果:共纳入 710 例患者,技术成功率和 nr-TS 分别为 692 例(98%)和 700 例(99%)。存在≥2个敌意解剖学肾下颈特征与技术失败相关(几率比[OR]:2.4;95%置信区间[CI]:1.3-4.1;P:0.007)。椎管内颈部角度>90°(OR:2.88;95% CI:9.6-50.3;P:0.004)、桶状(OR:2.33;95% CI:11.1-100.3;P:0.02)或存在≥2个敌对的解剖学椎管内颈部特征(OR:2.16;95% CI:2.5-5.3;P:0.03)是颈部相关技术失败的独立风险因素。6名(0.8%)患者在术后30天内死亡。慢性阻塞性肺病(OR:16;95% CI:1.1-218.3;P:0.04)和紧急修复(OR:15;95% CI:1.8-119.6;P:0.01)是术后 30 天内死亡的独立风险因素。平均随访时间为 53±13 个月。随访期间有12例(1.7%)ELIa。肾盂颈长度 28 mm(HR:2.7;95% CI:1.6-9.5;P:0.006)、角度≥90°(HR:2.7;95% CI:8.3-50.1;P:0.007)和持续性 II 型内漏(HR:2.9;95% CI:1.6-10.1;P:0.004)是 ELIa 的独立危险因素。5年后,91%的患者免于再次介入治疗。ELIa是随访期间再干预的独立风险因素(HR:29.5;95% CI:1.4-1.6;p):使用目前可用的血管内移植物进行血管内修复具有较高的 TS 值和较低的 30 天死亡率。中期存活率和 FFR 均令人满意。发现了技术和临床失败的术前/术后风险因素,这些因素应在 EVAR 适应症和术后管理中加以考虑,以减少并发症并改善中期预后:临床影响:可以确定EVAR技术和临床失败的术前和术后风险因素,在EVAR适应症和术后管理中应考虑这些因素,以减少并发症,改善中期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信