Book Review: Michael Niebauer, Virtuous Persuasion: A Theology of Christian Mission

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
M. Moore
{"title":"Book Review: Michael Niebauer, Virtuous Persuasion: A Theology of Christian Mission","authors":"M. Moore","doi":"10.1177/00918296231173551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"reading, but rather suggests that all monocultural readings will inevitably be limited and that modern interpreters are helped by gleaning insights from multiple cultural perspectives on biblical texts such as Romans. Wu makes several important claims. Paul’s main concern is not the individual standing before God (individualism) but communities (Paul’s strong collectivism implied by the hortatory sections of chapters 12–16) and their part in salvation history. In particular, Wu draws attention to the underappreciated and profoundly misunderstood themes of honor, shame, and face, noting that the term guilt does not even occur in the book. This reading highlights a profoundly relational purpose in the writing of Romans and how Paul’s hamartiology and soteriology contain fundamental honor– shame dimensions often missed by western interpreters. Most provocatively, Wu suggests Paul’s depiction of Jesus in Romans 5–8 is consistent with the notion of an obedient “filial” son, who restores God’s honor and thus enables the entire human family to participate in the honor (glory) of God and God’s kingdom. Wu engages in complex intercultural theological work, comparing the theological anthropology of Paul in Romans with that of Confucius. Though this helpful resource will not substitute for more exegetically rigorous commentaries on Romans, it can aid readers to glean new insights and provide a roadmap for thinking about Romans (and Scripture more broadly) in light of important themes salient to much of the global church. This book won Christianity Today’s 2020 Book of the Year Award of Merit in Biblical Studies.","PeriodicalId":43205,"journal":{"name":"Missiology-An International Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"289 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missiology-An International Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00918296231173551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

reading, but rather suggests that all monocultural readings will inevitably be limited and that modern interpreters are helped by gleaning insights from multiple cultural perspectives on biblical texts such as Romans. Wu makes several important claims. Paul’s main concern is not the individual standing before God (individualism) but communities (Paul’s strong collectivism implied by the hortatory sections of chapters 12–16) and their part in salvation history. In particular, Wu draws attention to the underappreciated and profoundly misunderstood themes of honor, shame, and face, noting that the term guilt does not even occur in the book. This reading highlights a profoundly relational purpose in the writing of Romans and how Paul’s hamartiology and soteriology contain fundamental honor– shame dimensions often missed by western interpreters. Most provocatively, Wu suggests Paul’s depiction of Jesus in Romans 5–8 is consistent with the notion of an obedient “filial” son, who restores God’s honor and thus enables the entire human family to participate in the honor (glory) of God and God’s kingdom. Wu engages in complex intercultural theological work, comparing the theological anthropology of Paul in Romans with that of Confucius. Though this helpful resource will not substitute for more exegetically rigorous commentaries on Romans, it can aid readers to glean new insights and provide a roadmap for thinking about Romans (and Scripture more broadly) in light of important themes salient to much of the global church. This book won Christianity Today’s 2020 Book of the Year Award of Merit in Biblical Studies.
书评:迈克尔·尼鲍尔,《善良的劝导:基督教使命的神学》
而是表明,所有单一文化的阅读都不可避免地会受到限制,现代诠释者可以从圣经文本(如罗马书)的多种文化视角中收集见解。吴提出了几个重要的主张。保罗主要关心的不是站在上帝面前的个人(个人主义),而是团体(保罗强烈的集体主义,隐含在第12-16章的告诫部分)和他们在救赎历史中的角色。吴特别注意到荣誉、羞耻和面子这些被低估和深刻误解的主题,并指出“内疚”一词甚至没有出现在书中。这段经文强调了罗马书写作中一个深刻的关系目的,以及保罗的罪论和救赎论如何包含西方解经家常常忽略的基本荣辱维度。最具挑衅性的是,吴认为保罗在罗马书5-8章中对耶稣的描述与一个顺从的“孝顺”的儿子的概念是一致的,他恢复了上帝的荣耀,从而使整个人类家庭都能分享上帝和上帝国度的荣耀。吴从事复杂的跨文化神学工作,将罗马书保罗的神学人类学与孔子的神学人类学进行比较。虽然这个有用的资源不能取代对罗马书的更严格的注释,但它可以帮助读者收集新的见解,并根据全球教会的重要主题,为思考罗马书(和更广泛的圣经)提供路线图。这本书获得了《今日基督教》2020年圣经研究年度图书奖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书