Clinical and demographic differences in the willingness to use self-administered at-home COVID-19 testing measures among persons with opioid use disorder.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Colleen B Mistler, Matthew Sullivan, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Michael M Copenhaver, Roman Shrestha
{"title":"Clinical and demographic differences in the willingness to use self-administered at-home COVID-19 testing measures among persons with opioid use disorder.","authors":"Colleen B Mistler, Matthew Sullivan, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Michael M Copenhaver, Roman Shrestha","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> COVID-19 is disproportionately affecting disadvantaged populations, including persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Persons with OUD are at greater risk for direct (e.g., COVID-19 diagnosis, severe symptoms) and indirect consequences (relapse, overdose) of COVID-19. Given stay at home orders, at-home testing options may serve as a viable tool to curb the increase in COVID-19 transmission and adverse effects of COVID-19. <i>Methods:</i> From May to September 2020, we surveyed 110 persons in treatment for OUD about their willingness to use various self-administered at-home COVID-19 testing measures. Participants were stratified by age, gender, and racial-ethnic identity to observe differences in willingness to use COVID-19 tests. The three COVID-19 tests included a throat swab sample, a saliva-based sample, and a blood prick test. <i>Results:</i> A high willingness to use at-home COVID-19 tests was observed in patients in treatment for OUD. A greater proportion of females were willing to use a saliva-based test; greater proportions of White participants were willing to use a saliva based COVID-19 test compared to racial-ethnic minorities. Older aged participants (≥45 years old) reported greater rates of willingness to use a self-administered at home blood prick test for COVID-19. <i>Conclusions:</i> At-home testing measures for COVID-19 appear highly acceptable among people with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"43 1","pages":"708-712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725184/pdf/nihms-1850082.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.2007511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is disproportionately affecting disadvantaged populations, including persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Persons with OUD are at greater risk for direct (e.g., COVID-19 diagnosis, severe symptoms) and indirect consequences (relapse, overdose) of COVID-19. Given stay at home orders, at-home testing options may serve as a viable tool to curb the increase in COVID-19 transmission and adverse effects of COVID-19. Methods: From May to September 2020, we surveyed 110 persons in treatment for OUD about their willingness to use various self-administered at-home COVID-19 testing measures. Participants were stratified by age, gender, and racial-ethnic identity to observe differences in willingness to use COVID-19 tests. The three COVID-19 tests included a throat swab sample, a saliva-based sample, and a blood prick test. Results: A high willingness to use at-home COVID-19 tests was observed in patients in treatment for OUD. A greater proportion of females were willing to use a saliva-based test; greater proportions of White participants were willing to use a saliva based COVID-19 test compared to racial-ethnic minorities. Older aged participants (≥45 years old) reported greater rates of willingness to use a self-administered at home blood prick test for COVID-19. Conclusions: At-home testing measures for COVID-19 appear highly acceptable among people with OUD.

阿片类药物使用障碍患者使用自制的 COVID-19 居家检测措施意愿的临床和人口学差异。
背景:COVID-19 对包括阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD) 患者在内的弱势群体的影响尤为严重。OUD 患者面临 COVID-19 直接后果(如 COVID-19 诊断、严重症状)和间接后果(复发、用药过量)的风险更大。考虑到留在家中的命令,上门检测方案可作为一种可行的工具来遏制 COVID-19 传播的增加和 COVID-19 的不良影响。方法:2020 年 5 月至 9 月,我们对 110 名接受 OUD 治疗的人进行了调查,了解他们是否愿意使用各种自制的 COVID-19 居家检测措施。根据年龄、性别和种族民族身份对参与者进行分层,以观察他们使用 COVID-19 检测的意愿差异。三种 COVID-19 测试包括咽拭子样本、唾液样本和刺血测试。结果显示在接受 OUD 治疗的患者中,使用 COVID-19 居家检测的意愿很高。愿意使用唾液检测的女性比例更高;与少数种族相比,愿意使用唾液 COVID-19 检测的白人比例更高。年龄较大(≥45 岁)的参与者更愿意在家中自行进行 COVID-19 滴血测试。结论在 OUD 患者中,COVID-19 的居家检测措施似乎非常容易被接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信