Differential diagnostic capabilities of calculating the level of neutrophil extracellular traps in the venous blood of pregnant women: a comparative prospective study

N. B. Kuzina, E. N. Plakhotina, A. Kuzovlev, T. N. Belousova, E. V. Bryantsev, D. V. Kasina
{"title":"Differential diagnostic capabilities of calculating the level of neutrophil extracellular traps in the venous blood of pregnant women: a comparative prospective study","authors":"N. B. Kuzina, E. N. Plakhotina, A. Kuzovlev, T. N. Belousova, E. V. Bryantsev, D. V. Kasina","doi":"10.21320/1818-474x-2021-4-79-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Severe preeclampsia in early stages can be detected by isolated thrombocytopenia, which makes it difficult to diagnose it in time and carry out the necessary therapeutic measures. As a rule, the diagnosis of severe preeclampsia can be declared with a detailed clinical and laboratory researches, and it increases the risks for the mother and the embryo. However, if there are no clinical symptoms of preeclampsia except of thrombocytopenia, there is a problem of differential diagnosis between thrombocytopenia, which has the same symptoms as preeclampsia and gestational thrombocytopenia, which is a physiological peculiarity and does not require any medical interventions and restrictions. Nowadays there are no screening methods for differential diagnosis of these conditions. Objectives. To estimate the possibilities of determing the level of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) during the differential diagnosis of preeclampsia and gestational thrombocytopenia. Materials and methods. The comparative analysis of the level of NETs was carried out in three groups of pregnant women. Group 1 included patients with severe preeclampsia (n = 45), group 2-patients with gestational thrombocytopenia (n = 44) and group 3 consisted of healthy pregnant women (n = 44). Results. The research revealed significant increase in the level of NETs in the group of patients with preeclampsia (15.26 %,) compared with the groups of healthy patients (7.65 %, p = 0.001) and patients with gestational thrombocytopenia (7.04 %, р = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the level of NETs between the groups of healthy patients and patients with gestational thrombocytopenia. Conclusions. A significant increase of the level of NETs among the patients with severe preeclampsia allows us to consider the method of calculating the level of NETs among patients with thrombocytopenia which can be detected after the 20th week of pregnancy, if there are no other laboratory and clinical signs of preeclampsia as a screening method for early diagnosis of this complication.","PeriodicalId":93261,"journal":{"name":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2021-4-79-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Severe preeclampsia in early stages can be detected by isolated thrombocytopenia, which makes it difficult to diagnose it in time and carry out the necessary therapeutic measures. As a rule, the diagnosis of severe preeclampsia can be declared with a detailed clinical and laboratory researches, and it increases the risks for the mother and the embryo. However, if there are no clinical symptoms of preeclampsia except of thrombocytopenia, there is a problem of differential diagnosis between thrombocytopenia, which has the same symptoms as preeclampsia and gestational thrombocytopenia, which is a physiological peculiarity and does not require any medical interventions and restrictions. Nowadays there are no screening methods for differential diagnosis of these conditions. Objectives. To estimate the possibilities of determing the level of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) during the differential diagnosis of preeclampsia and gestational thrombocytopenia. Materials and methods. The comparative analysis of the level of NETs was carried out in three groups of pregnant women. Group 1 included patients with severe preeclampsia (n = 45), group 2-patients with gestational thrombocytopenia (n = 44) and group 3 consisted of healthy pregnant women (n = 44). Results. The research revealed significant increase in the level of NETs in the group of patients with preeclampsia (15.26 %,) compared with the groups of healthy patients (7.65 %, p = 0.001) and patients with gestational thrombocytopenia (7.04 %, р = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the level of NETs between the groups of healthy patients and patients with gestational thrombocytopenia. Conclusions. A significant increase of the level of NETs among the patients with severe preeclampsia allows us to consider the method of calculating the level of NETs among patients with thrombocytopenia which can be detected after the 20th week of pregnancy, if there are no other laboratory and clinical signs of preeclampsia as a screening method for early diagnosis of this complication.
计算孕妇静脉血中中性粒细胞胞外陷阱水平的鉴别诊断能力:一项比较前瞻性研究
介绍。早期重度子痫前期可通过孤立性血小板减少症检测出来,但难以及时诊断并采取必要的治疗措施。通常情况下,重度子痫前期的诊断需要经过详细的临床和实验室研究才能宣布,这增加了母亲和胚胎的风险。但是,如果子痫前期除血小板减少外没有其他临床症状,则存在血小板减少症的鉴别诊断问题,血小板减少症与子痫前期和妊娠期血小板减少症具有相同的症状,是一种生理特殊性,不需要任何医学干预和限制。目前还没有筛查方法来鉴别诊断这些疾病。目标。评估在子痫前期和妊娠血小板减少症的鉴别诊断中测定中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NETs)水平的可能性。材料和方法。对三组孕妇进行NETs水平的比较分析。组1为重度先兆子痫患者(n = 45),组2为妊娠期血小板减少患者(n = 44),组3为健康孕妇(n = 44)。结果。研究显示,与健康组(7.65%,p = 0.001)和妊娠期血小板减少组(7.04%,p = 0.002)相比,子痫前期患者组(15.26%)的NETs水平显著升高。正常组与妊娠期血小板减少组间NETs水平无显著差异。结论。重度子痫前期患者NETs水平的显著升高,使我们可以考虑计算妊娠20周后可检测到的血小板减少患者NETs水平的方法,如果没有其他子痫前期的实验室和临床体征,作为早期诊断该并发症的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信