Climate Stories: enabling and sustaining arts interventions in climate science communication

Q2 Social Sciences
E. Woodley, S. Barr, P. Stott, Pierrette Thomet, Sally Flint, Fiona Lovell, Evelyn O’Malley, D. Plews, C. Rapley, C. Robbins, Rebecca Pearce, Rebecca Sandover
{"title":"Climate Stories: enabling and sustaining arts interventions in climate science communication","authors":"E. Woodley, S. Barr, P. Stott, Pierrette Thomet, Sally Flint, Fiona Lovell, Evelyn O’Malley, D. Plews, C. Rapley, C. Robbins, Rebecca Pearce, Rebecca Sandover","doi":"10.5194/gc-5-339-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The climate science community faces a major challenge with respect to communicating the\nrisks associated with climate change within a heavily politicised landscape that is\ncharacterised by varying degrees of denial, scepticism, distrust in\nscientific enterprise, and an increased prevalence of misinformation (“fake\nnews”). This issue is particularly significant given the reliance on\nconventional “deficit” communication approaches, which are based on the\nassumption that scientific information provision will necessarily lead to\ndesired behavioural changes. Indeed, the constrained orthodoxy of scientific practices in seeking to maintain strict objectivity and political separation imposes very tangible limits on the potential effectiveness of climate\nscientists for communicating risk in many contemporary settings. To address\nthese challenges, this paper uses insights from a collaboration between UK\nclimate scientists and artist researchers to argue for a more creative and\nemotionally attentive approach to climate science engagement and advocacy.\nIn so doing, the paper highlights innovative ways in which climate change\ncommunication can be reimagined through different art forms to enable\ncomplex concepts to become knowable. We suggest that in learning to express\ntheir work through forms of art, including print-making, theatre and\nperformance, song-writing, and creative writing, researchers experienced not\nonly a sense of liberation from the rigid communicative framework operating\nin their familiar scientific environment but also a growing self-confidence in their ability and willingness to engage in new ways of expressing their work. As such, we argue that scientific institutions and funding bodies should recognise the potential value of climate scientists engaging in advocacy through art–science collaborations and that these personal investments and contributions to science engagement by individuals should be rewarded and valued alongside conventional scientific outputs.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-339-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. The climate science community faces a major challenge with respect to communicating the risks associated with climate change within a heavily politicised landscape that is characterised by varying degrees of denial, scepticism, distrust in scientific enterprise, and an increased prevalence of misinformation (“fake news”). This issue is particularly significant given the reliance on conventional “deficit” communication approaches, which are based on the assumption that scientific information provision will necessarily lead to desired behavioural changes. Indeed, the constrained orthodoxy of scientific practices in seeking to maintain strict objectivity and political separation imposes very tangible limits on the potential effectiveness of climate scientists for communicating risk in many contemporary settings. To address these challenges, this paper uses insights from a collaboration between UK climate scientists and artist researchers to argue for a more creative and emotionally attentive approach to climate science engagement and advocacy. In so doing, the paper highlights innovative ways in which climate change communication can be reimagined through different art forms to enable complex concepts to become knowable. We suggest that in learning to express their work through forms of art, including print-making, theatre and performance, song-writing, and creative writing, researchers experienced not only a sense of liberation from the rigid communicative framework operating in their familiar scientific environment but also a growing self-confidence in their ability and willingness to engage in new ways of expressing their work. As such, we argue that scientific institutions and funding bodies should recognise the potential value of climate scientists engaging in advocacy through art–science collaborations and that these personal investments and contributions to science engagement by individuals should be rewarded and valued alongside conventional scientific outputs.
气候故事:在气候科学传播中启用和维持艺术干预
摘要气候科学界面临着一个重大挑战,即在一个高度政治化的环境中传播与气候变化相关的风险,这种环境的特点是不同程度的否认、怀疑、对科学事业的不信任,以及错误信息(“假新闻”)的日益流行。考虑到对传统的“缺陷”沟通方法的依赖,这个问题尤为重要,这种方法是基于科学信息的提供必然会导致预期的行为改变的假设。事实上,在寻求保持严格的客观性和政治分离的科学实践中,受约束的正统观念对气候科学家在许多当代环境中传达风险的潜在有效性施加了非常明显的限制。为了应对这些挑战,本文利用英国气候科学家和艺术家研究人员之间合作的见解,论证了一种更具创造性和情感关注的气候科学参与和倡导方法。通过这样做,论文强调了气候变化传播可以通过不同的艺术形式重新想象的创新方式,从而使复杂的概念变得可知。我们认为,在学习通过艺术形式,包括版画、戏剧和表演、歌曲创作和创意写作来表达他们的工作时,研究人员不仅从他们熟悉的科学环境中僵化的交流框架中解放出来,而且对他们的能力和意愿越来越自信,他们愿意用新的方式来表达他们的工作。因此,我们认为科学机构和资助机构应该认识到气候科学家通过艺术与科学合作参与倡导的潜在价值,并且这些个人投资和个人对科学参与的贡献应该与传统的科学产出一样得到奖励和重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信