Trust the Process

Kate Roberts Bucca, Dominic Bucca
{"title":"Trust the Process","authors":"Kate Roberts Bucca, Dominic Bucca","doi":"10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i2.1233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the benefits or drawbacks of a low-residency educational delivery model? How does the process of designing one's own study impact the work completed in a distance education program with this form of delivery? As researchers who found success in a low-residency undergraduate program, we engaged in a duoethnographic study to mine our experiences and better understand the advantages and disadvantages of this educational model. We engaged in four recorded conversations over the course of three weeks, with sessions ranging from 35 to 60 minutes each. Between sessions, we journaled in a shared online document, discussing our emerging understandings of the topic, responding to each other's perspectives, and pushing one another to articulate and revisit our stances. Through these oral and written dialogues, we identified six themes featured in the low-residency educational model: reduced stigma for non-traditional students, diversity of community, flexibility, self-designed study, staying connected, and clarity of boundaries. \nKeywords: low-residency, distance education, duoethnography, self-designed learning, non-traditional students","PeriodicalId":52947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Distance Education and ELearning","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Distance Education and ELearning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i2.1233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are the benefits or drawbacks of a low-residency educational delivery model? How does the process of designing one's own study impact the work completed in a distance education program with this form of delivery? As researchers who found success in a low-residency undergraduate program, we engaged in a duoethnographic study to mine our experiences and better understand the advantages and disadvantages of this educational model. We engaged in four recorded conversations over the course of three weeks, with sessions ranging from 35 to 60 minutes each. Between sessions, we journaled in a shared online document, discussing our emerging understandings of the topic, responding to each other's perspectives, and pushing one another to articulate and revisit our stances. Through these oral and written dialogues, we identified six themes featured in the low-residency educational model: reduced stigma for non-traditional students, diversity of community, flexibility, self-designed study, staying connected, and clarity of boundaries. Keywords: low-residency, distance education, duoethnography, self-designed learning, non-traditional students
信任过程
低住院率教育模式的优点和缺点是什么?设计自己学习的过程如何影响在这种形式的远程教育项目中完成的工作?作为在低住院率本科项目中取得成功的研究人员,我们进行了一项多民族志研究,以挖掘我们的经验,更好地了解这种教育模式的利弊。在三周的时间里,我们进行了四次录音对话,每次时长从35分钟到60分钟不等。在会议间隙,我们在一个共享的在线文档中记录日志,讨论我们对这个主题的新理解,回应彼此的观点,并推动彼此阐明和重新审视我们的立场。通过这些口头和书面对话,我们确定了低住院教育模式的六个特色主题:减少非传统学生的耻辱,社区的多样性,灵活性,自主设计的学习,保持联系和清晰的边界。关键词:低居住,远程教育,多元民族学,自主学习,非传统学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信