Methodology of physical exercise: A proposal and reliability of a questionnaire for fitness professionals

IF 0.7 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
F. Cantieri, Antônio Carlos Gomes, Gustavo Aires de Arruda, D. Coledam, E. Ribeiro, M. V. D. de Barros, Á. Aranha
{"title":"Methodology of physical exercise: A proposal and reliability of a questionnaire for fitness professionals","authors":"F. Cantieri, Antônio Carlos Gomes, Gustavo Aires de Arruda, D. Coledam, E. Ribeiro, M. V. D. de Barros, Á. Aranha","doi":"10.29359/bjhpa.13.4.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several benefits of physical exercise for health are described in the literature and knowing the methodology adopted by professionals is relevant. Objective: Proposal and analysis of the psychometric properties of a questionnaire on the methodological practice of professionals working in the fitness area. Material and methods: Design: Reproducibility study. Method: The questionnaire was prepared following the steps: search for existing instruments, elaboration of the questions, pretesting (n = 30), face/content validity (n = 5), and reliability (n = 333). The internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha), magnitude of the association between nominal questions (Cramer's V or Phi) and test-retest reliability (Kappa coefficient) were analyzed. Results: The Cronbach's Alpha value was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.70–0.83). The mean value of Cramer's V was 0.16 (±0.06). Test-retest reliability values ranged from fair to good, with percentage agreement ranging from 48.8% (95%CI: 37.8–59.8) to 90.3% (95%CI: 81.3–95.4). Conclusions: The questionnaire serves the purpose for which it was created and can be applied to identify how professionals structure their practices.","PeriodicalId":43798,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.13.4.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several benefits of physical exercise for health are described in the literature and knowing the methodology adopted by professionals is relevant. Objective: Proposal and analysis of the psychometric properties of a questionnaire on the methodological practice of professionals working in the fitness area. Material and methods: Design: Reproducibility study. Method: The questionnaire was prepared following the steps: search for existing instruments, elaboration of the questions, pretesting (n = 30), face/content validity (n = 5), and reliability (n = 333). The internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha), magnitude of the association between nominal questions (Cramer's V or Phi) and test-retest reliability (Kappa coefficient) were analyzed. Results: The Cronbach's Alpha value was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.70–0.83). The mean value of Cramer's V was 0.16 (±0.06). Test-retest reliability values ranged from fair to good, with percentage agreement ranging from 48.8% (95%CI: 37.8–59.8) to 90.3% (95%CI: 81.3–95.4). Conclusions: The questionnaire serves the purpose for which it was created and can be applied to identify how professionals structure their practices.
体育锻炼的方法学:健身专业人员问卷调查的建议和可靠性
背景:文献中描述了体育锻炼对健康的几个好处,了解专业人员采用的方法是相关的。目的:提出并分析健身专业人员方法论实践问卷的心理测量特征。材料与方法:设计:可重复性研究。方法:编制问卷的步骤为:查找现有工具、拟定问题、预测(n = 30)、面效度(n = 5)、信度(n = 333)。分析了内部一致性(Cronbach’s Alpha)、名义题(Cramer’s V或Phi)与重测信度(Kappa系数)之间的关联程度。结果:Cronbach’s Alpha值为0.78 (95%CI: 0.70 ~ 0.83)。克拉默氏V的平均值为0.16(±0.06)。重测信度值范围从一般到良好,一致性百分比范围从48.8% (95%CI: 37.8-59.8)到90.3% (95%CI: 81.3-95.4)。结论:调查问卷服务于它被创建的目的,并且可以应用于确定专业人员如何构建他们的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信