SDG16+ implementation in fragile and conflict-affected states: what do the data tell us six years into Agenda 2030?

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
S. Baranyi, Yiagadeesen Samy, Bianca Washuta
{"title":"SDG16+ implementation in fragile and conflict-affected states: what do the data tell us six years into Agenda 2030?","authors":"S. Baranyi, Yiagadeesen Samy, Bianca Washuta","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2021.2000812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT SDG16+ on peaceful societies, justice and strong institutions is often presented as a ‘strategic lever’ to enable the implementation of other SDGs, hence the ‘+’ often added to that goal. This is especially the case in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS) where violence and weak governance are seen as major constraints on development. Six years into Agenda 2030, this paper triangulates official reports such as Voluntary National Reviews, and third-party sources, to ascertain the implementation of SDG16+ in a broad sample of FCAS and in seven specific fragile countries. We observe varying levels of effort on implementation, yet an overall trend towards superficial compliance. Informed by institutional theory, we argue that such uneven implementation is not just a function of limited data or resources, but of the varied commitment of elites to enable or prevent the consolidation of peace, justice and effective institutions.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"20 1","pages":"727 - 748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.2000812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT SDG16+ on peaceful societies, justice and strong institutions is often presented as a ‘strategic lever’ to enable the implementation of other SDGs, hence the ‘+’ often added to that goal. This is especially the case in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS) where violence and weak governance are seen as major constraints on development. Six years into Agenda 2030, this paper triangulates official reports such as Voluntary National Reviews, and third-party sources, to ascertain the implementation of SDG16+ in a broad sample of FCAS and in seven specific fragile countries. We observe varying levels of effort on implementation, yet an overall trend towards superficial compliance. Informed by institutional theory, we argue that such uneven implementation is not just a function of limited data or resources, but of the varied commitment of elites to enable or prevent the consolidation of peace, justice and effective institutions.
可持续发展目标16+在脆弱和受冲突影响国家的实施:《2030年议程》实施6年后的数据告诉我们什么?
关于和平社会、正义和强大机构的可持续发展目标16+通常被视为实现其他可持续发展目标的“战略杠杆”,因此该目标经常被加上“+”。在暴力和治理薄弱被视为发展的主要制约因素的脆弱和受冲突影响国家(FCAS)尤其如此。《2030年议程》实施六年后,本文对自愿国家审查等官方报告和第三方来源进行了三角分析,以确定可持续发展目标16+在FCAS的广泛样本和七个特定脆弱国家的实施情况。我们观察到在实现上的不同程度的努力,但是总体趋向于表面的遵从。在制度理论的指导下,我们认为这种不平衡的执行不仅仅是有限的数据或资源的功能,而是精英们在促进或阻止和平、正义和有效制度巩固方面的不同承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信