Comparison of Sunn Pest Damage and Genotypic Differences in Bread Wheat Varieties by SDS-Page Analysis

B. Ismet, S. Akyürek
{"title":"Comparison of Sunn Pest Damage and Genotypic Differences in Bread Wheat Varieties by SDS-Page Analysis","authors":"B. Ismet, S. Akyürek","doi":"10.24297/JAA.V8I1.7666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was carried out in five different locations in 2010 and 2011 years under in the ecological conditions of Hayrabolu, Malkara, Suleymanpasa, sarköy and Saray district. Twenty-three bread wheat varieties were used as material in the study. the study carried out in the same area was made up of 2 different growing conditions, namely field conditions and a covered area covered with sunlight. The sunn pest damage rates in wheat varieties grown in the open area were ranged from of 6.0. to 0.10 %.  The sunn pest damage rates in bread wheat varieties grown in closing area was changed between 10.37 to 23.17% with a significant increase. the average of the highest sunn pest damage in two years was observed the numbered 15, 10, 1, 11 and 16 cultivars, while the lowest values was obtained form 4, 13, 8 and 3 varieties According to the SDS-PAGE analysis in order to determine the genotypic differences of bread wheat varieties, protein band number in bread wheat varieties was ranged from 17 to 21, the density and molecular weight of protein bands were significant differences among the varieties. Protein bands are distributed predominantly in the omega region while in the gamma and beta regions a small number of bands were observed. There are no bands in bread wheat varieties in the alpha region.","PeriodicalId":14915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Agriculture","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24297/JAA.V8I1.7666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research was carried out in five different locations in 2010 and 2011 years under in the ecological conditions of Hayrabolu, Malkara, Suleymanpasa, sarköy and Saray district. Twenty-three bread wheat varieties were used as material in the study. the study carried out in the same area was made up of 2 different growing conditions, namely field conditions and a covered area covered with sunlight. The sunn pest damage rates in wheat varieties grown in the open area were ranged from of 6.0. to 0.10 %.  The sunn pest damage rates in bread wheat varieties grown in closing area was changed between 10.37 to 23.17% with a significant increase. the average of the highest sunn pest damage in two years was observed the numbered 15, 10, 1, 11 and 16 cultivars, while the lowest values was obtained form 4, 13, 8 and 3 varieties According to the SDS-PAGE analysis in order to determine the genotypic differences of bread wheat varieties, protein band number in bread wheat varieties was ranged from 17 to 21, the density and molecular weight of protein bands were significant differences among the varieties. Protein bands are distributed predominantly in the omega region while in the gamma and beta regions a small number of bands were observed. There are no bands in bread wheat varieties in the alpha region.
基于SDS-Page分析的面包小麦品种日光害虫危害及基因型差异比较
研究于2010年和2011年在Hayrabolu、Malkara、Suleymanpasa、sarköy和Saray地区的五个不同地点进行。以23个面包用小麦品种为研究材料。在同一地区进行的研究由2种不同的生长条件组成,即田间条件和有光照覆盖的区域。露天区小麦品种日害率在6.0 ~ 6.0之间。到0.10%。封育区面包小麦品种的日害率在10.37% ~ 23.17%之间变化,且显著升高。2年平均日晒害最高的品种为15、10、1、11和16个品种,最低的品种为4、13、8和3个品种。为了确定面包小麦品种的基因型差异,通过SDS-PAGE分析,面包小麦品种的蛋白质带数为17 ~ 21条,蛋白质带密度和分子量在品种间差异显著。蛋白质条带主要分布在omega区域,而在gamma和beta区域观察到少量条带。在α区面包小麦品种中没有条带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书