A. D. Bona, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís Antônio Di Guida
{"title":"Bond Strength of Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets to Aged Resinbased Composite Restorations","authors":"A. D. Bona, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís Antônio Di Guida","doi":"10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBackground: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation.\nThus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate\nprotocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.\n\nObjective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets\nbonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.\n\nMethods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20)\nas follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38%\nphosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed\nbur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to\nACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens\nwere stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and\nTukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.\n\nResults: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when\nusing the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because\nof different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution\ngenerated complex failures.\n\nConclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated,\nsufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.\n","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation.
Thus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate
protocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.
Objective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets
bonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.
Methods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20)
as follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38%
phosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed
bur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to
ACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens
were stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and
Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.
Results: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when
using the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because
of different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution
generated complex failures.
Conclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated,
sufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.