Performance of a milk leukocyte differential test for decision-making in a selective dry cow therapy program

J. Denis-Robichaud, R. Almeida, S. Ivey, R. Rodríguez, M. Payne, K. Leslie, M. Hockett
{"title":"Performance of a milk leukocyte differential test for decision-making in a selective dry cow therapy program","authors":"J. Denis-Robichaud, R. Almeida, S. Ivey, R. Rodríguez, M. Payne, K. Leslie, M. Hockett","doi":"10.21423/BOVINE-VOL53NO2P150-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the operating characteristics of a commercial milk leukocyte differential (MLD) test to detect intramammary infections in quarters of late-lactation dairy cows as compared to bacteriological culture and 2) to evaluate the milk production and udder health parameters between cows treated following blanket vs selective dry cow therapy (DCT) using the MLD test results. In a first experiment, the MLD test was compared to the bacteriological culture results (gold standard) of 363 quarters from 94 cows. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for the identification of infection using the MLD test were determined. Sensitivity ranged from 44% to 77%, and specificity from 54% to 92%. In the second experiment blanket DCT was compared to selective DCT based on the results of MLD test, and treating only positive quarters; a total of 328 cows were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment groups. The proportion of quarters positive to bacteriological culture, and the incidence rate of moderate and severe cases of clinical mastitis events, did not differ between treatment groups. Results of these experiments provide information to support decision-making in a selective DCT program in low-SCC herds using the MLD test.","PeriodicalId":22281,"journal":{"name":"The Bovine practitioner","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bovine practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/BOVINE-VOL53NO2P150-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the operating characteristics of a commercial milk leukocyte differential (MLD) test to detect intramammary infections in quarters of late-lactation dairy cows as compared to bacteriological culture and 2) to evaluate the milk production and udder health parameters between cows treated following blanket vs selective dry cow therapy (DCT) using the MLD test results. In a first experiment, the MLD test was compared to the bacteriological culture results (gold standard) of 363 quarters from 94 cows. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for the identification of infection using the MLD test were determined. Sensitivity ranged from 44% to 77%, and specificity from 54% to 92%. In the second experiment blanket DCT was compared to selective DCT based on the results of MLD test, and treating only positive quarters; a total of 328 cows were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment groups. The proportion of quarters positive to bacteriological culture, and the incidence rate of moderate and severe cases of clinical mastitis events, did not differ between treatment groups. Results of these experiments provide information to support decision-making in a selective DCT program in low-SCC herds using the MLD test.
乳白细胞鉴别试验在选择性干牛治疗方案决策中的表现
本研究的目的是1)确定商业乳白细胞差异(MLD)测试的运行特征,以检测四分之一的泌乳后期奶牛的乳腺内感染,并与细菌学培养进行比较;2)利用MLD测试结果评估采用毯治疗与选择性干奶牛治疗(DCT)治疗的奶牛之间的产奶量和乳房健康参数。在第一次试验中,将MLD试验与94头奶牛363节的细菌培养结果(金标准)进行了比较。确定了使用MLD试验识别感染的敏感性、特异性和预测值。敏感性为44% ~ 77%,特异性为54% ~ 92%。在第二个实验中,根据MLD试验的结果,将毯子DCT与选择性DCT进行比较,并仅治疗阳性部位;328头奶牛随机分为1个处理组。各治疗组间细菌培养阳性率、临床乳腺炎事件中、重度病例发生率无显著差异。这些实验的结果为支持在低scc畜群中使用MLD测试进行选择性DCT计划的决策提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信