O. Ulybina, Laia Pi Ferrer, Pertti Alasuutari
求助PDF
{"title":"Managing the crisis: International organisations’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic as legitimation work","authors":"O. Ulybina, Laia Pi Ferrer, Pertti Alasuutari","doi":"10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes legitimation practices of international organisations in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We analyse a sample of 252 major international governmental organisations (IGOs) and 250 international non-governmental organisations (INGOs), using information collected from their websites in September–December 2020. We seek to understand why the vast majority of both IGOs and INGOs responded to the crisis and what were the different types of reactions. We study variations in legitimation practices among different types of organisations–governmental vs non-governmental, general-purpose vs task-specific, large vs small, etc. Drawing on rational choice and neo-institutionalist scholarship, we test several hypotheses to account for the patterns of IO's legitimation work triggered by COVID-19 crisis. Our findings give some support to both theoretical perspectives. Organisation's resources are the best predictor for its conduct in response to the crisis. At the same time, organisations largely behave in a conformist way, actively engaging in legitimation work, and investing in their public visibility in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":37289,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2023.2195479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
危机管理:国际组织应对COVID-19大流行的合法性工作
本文分析了面对新冠肺炎全球大流行,国际组织的合法化实践。我们分析了252个主要国际政府组织(igo)和250个国际非政府组织(ingo)的样本,使用了2020年9月至12月从其网站收集的信息。我们试图了解为什么绝大多数政府间组织和国际非政府组织都对危机做出了反应,以及不同的反应类型是什么。我们研究不同类型的组织——政府组织与非政府组织、通用组织与特定任务组织、大型组织与小型组织等——在合法化实践方面的差异。利用理性选择和新制度主义学术,我们测试了几个假设,以解释COVID-19危机引发的国际刑事组织合法化工作的模式。我们的研究结果为这两种理论观点提供了一些支持。组织的资源是其应对危机行为的最佳预测指标。与此同时,组织在很大程度上以墨守成规的方式行事,积极参与合法化工作,并投资于与COVID-19大流行相关的公众知名度。©2023作者。由Informa UK Limited出版,以Taylor & Francis Group的名义进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。