Digital health technology and hypertension management: a qualitative analysis of patient and specialist provider preferences on data tracking

Ryan Chow, Bruce Forde, Rick Sawatzky, Astrid García Patiño, K. Tran, J. Bittman, N. Khan
{"title":"Digital health technology and hypertension management: a qualitative analysis of patient and specialist provider preferences on data tracking","authors":"Ryan Chow, Bruce Forde, Rick Sawatzky, Astrid García Patiño, K. Tran, J. Bittman, N. Khan","doi":"10.20517/ch.2022.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Digital health for hypertension management holds potential for improving the quality of care but requires long-term patient engagement to track health data. We explored patient and hypertension specialist perceptions of clinical utility for data tracking including standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), home blood pressure (BP) measurement, and other health metrics. Methods: Participants reviewed general health status, patient satisfaction, and hypertension-specific PROMs. Semi-structured focus groups (n = 15) with nine patients with hypertension and six hypertension specialists were audio-recorded and thematically analyzed. Results: Key themes identified from patients included: (1) comfort and appreciation of home BP monitoring but only during important periods of hypertension care; (2) preference for tracking new symptoms and medication side effects; (3) patients perceived tracking other health measures including general PROMs, diet and exercise as less relevant to their care; and (4) visually represented BP trends evaluating associations with changes in other health parameters were perceived as useful. Key themes identified by hypertension specialists included: (1) concerns about patient digital literacy; (2) utilizing visual representations of long-term BP data trends for patient empowerment; and (3) unclear relevance of tracking medication adverse effects, PROMs, and other non-BP health metrics. Conclusion: Patients and hypertension specialists had similar perspectives for most aspects of data monitoring but differed in preference for a few aspects that were germane to patients, including monitoring medication adverse effects and symptoms. Including views on data tracking from both patients and providers are essential for designing digital tools to optimize hypertension management.","PeriodicalId":93536,"journal":{"name":"Connected health","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connected health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2022.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Digital health for hypertension management holds potential for improving the quality of care but requires long-term patient engagement to track health data. We explored patient and hypertension specialist perceptions of clinical utility for data tracking including standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), home blood pressure (BP) measurement, and other health metrics. Methods: Participants reviewed general health status, patient satisfaction, and hypertension-specific PROMs. Semi-structured focus groups (n = 15) with nine patients with hypertension and six hypertension specialists were audio-recorded and thematically analyzed. Results: Key themes identified from patients included: (1) comfort and appreciation of home BP monitoring but only during important periods of hypertension care; (2) preference for tracking new symptoms and medication side effects; (3) patients perceived tracking other health measures including general PROMs, diet and exercise as less relevant to their care; and (4) visually represented BP trends evaluating associations with changes in other health parameters were perceived as useful. Key themes identified by hypertension specialists included: (1) concerns about patient digital literacy; (2) utilizing visual representations of long-term BP data trends for patient empowerment; and (3) unclear relevance of tracking medication adverse effects, PROMs, and other non-BP health metrics. Conclusion: Patients and hypertension specialists had similar perspectives for most aspects of data monitoring but differed in preference for a few aspects that were germane to patients, including monitoring medication adverse effects and symptoms. Including views on data tracking from both patients and providers are essential for designing digital tools to optimize hypertension management.
数字健康技术和高血压管理:患者和专科医生对数据跟踪偏好的定性分析
目的:高血压管理的数字健康具有提高护理质量的潜力,但需要患者长期参与以跟踪健康数据。我们探讨了患者和高血压专家对数据跟踪的临床效用的看法,包括标准化的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)、家庭血压(BP)测量和其他健康指标。方法:参与者回顾了一般健康状况、患者满意度和高血压特异性PROMs。对9名高血压患者和6名高血压专科医生组成的半结构化焦点小组(n = 15)进行录音并进行主题分析。结果:从患者中确定的关键主题包括:(1)舒适和欣赏家庭血压监测,但仅在高血压护理的重要时期;(2)偏好追踪新症状和药物副作用;(3)患者认为跟踪其他健康措施,包括一般PROMs、饮食和运动与他们的护理不太相关;(4)可视化地表示BP趋势,评估与其他健康参数变化的关联被认为是有用的。高血压专家确定的关键主题包括:(1)对患者数字素养的担忧;(2)利用长期血压数据趋势的可视化表示为患者赋权;(3)追踪药物不良反应、PROMs和其他非bp健康指标的相关性不明确。结论:患者和高血压专科医生在数据监测的大多数方面有相似的观点,但在与患者相关的一些方面有不同的偏好,包括监测药物不良反应和症状。包括患者和提供者对数据跟踪的看法对于设计优化高血压管理的数字工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信