Distribution Pipeline Risk Framework

Jason B. Skow, Ryan Stewart, Rob McPherson, Kent Schoenroth
{"title":"Distribution Pipeline Risk Framework","authors":"Jason B. Skow, Ryan Stewart, Rob McPherson, Kent Schoenroth","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n By nature, gas distribution is a network system; it does not fit well with traditional pipeline risk models that assume a linear geometry. Distribution system growth is multigenerational and often leads to mixed assets in the same area where transmission pipeline segments are often constructed within shorter time frames and more uniform materials. Slow, sporadic growth leads to varied record availability and quality that might not readily support commercially available risk models. The project described in this paper was initiated to develop predictive methods to prioritize mitigation and replacement activities for distribution networks. Priority is assigned to areas by risk, equipment characteristics and environmental attributes.\n In a previous IPC paper, the authors developed a histori-calbased predictive model but applied it to a single city area. This work has been extended to cover the entire province of Saskatchewan. The model relies on logistic regression and a machine learning algorithm to associate the historical failure rate with the asset type, age, pipe material, diameter, pressure, and an array of geographical-dependent attributes such as soil properties and climate events. The output of the model allows integrity engineers to consider predicted failure rates to complement the lagging performance indicators used to develop integrity program planning. This model demonstrates the advantage of using available distribution system records to develop a custom historicalbased predictive model.\n Consequence estimates for distribution networks are also described. Distribution leaks are often classified into hazard levels that differentiate operational response. These are assigned based on incident data records and SME input to develop an event tree for the consequence of a distribution leak. This paper summarizes the work performed during the project to calculate distribution asset probability of failure and consequences.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By nature, gas distribution is a network system; it does not fit well with traditional pipeline risk models that assume a linear geometry. Distribution system growth is multigenerational and often leads to mixed assets in the same area where transmission pipeline segments are often constructed within shorter time frames and more uniform materials. Slow, sporadic growth leads to varied record availability and quality that might not readily support commercially available risk models. The project described in this paper was initiated to develop predictive methods to prioritize mitigation and replacement activities for distribution networks. Priority is assigned to areas by risk, equipment characteristics and environmental attributes. In a previous IPC paper, the authors developed a histori-calbased predictive model but applied it to a single city area. This work has been extended to cover the entire province of Saskatchewan. The model relies on logistic regression and a machine learning algorithm to associate the historical failure rate with the asset type, age, pipe material, diameter, pressure, and an array of geographical-dependent attributes such as soil properties and climate events. The output of the model allows integrity engineers to consider predicted failure rates to complement the lagging performance indicators used to develop integrity program planning. This model demonstrates the advantage of using available distribution system records to develop a custom historicalbased predictive model. Consequence estimates for distribution networks are also described. Distribution leaks are often classified into hazard levels that differentiate operational response. These are assigned based on incident data records and SME input to develop an event tree for the consequence of a distribution leak. This paper summarizes the work performed during the project to calculate distribution asset probability of failure and consequences.
配电管道风险框架
从本质上讲,燃气分配是一个网络系统;它不能很好地适应传统的管道风险模型,该模型假定为线性几何。配电系统的增长是多代的,经常导致同一地区的混合资产,而输电管道段通常在更短的时间内建造,材料更统一。缓慢的、零星的增长导致不同的记录可用性和质量,可能不容易支持商业上可用的风险模型。本文所述项目的启动是为了开发预测方法,以优先考虑配电网络的缓解和更换活动。根据风险、设备特性和环境属性优先分配区域。在IPC之前的一篇论文中,作者开发了一个基于历史计算的预测模型,但将其应用于单个城市区域。这项工作已扩展到整个萨斯喀彻温省。该模型依赖于逻辑回归和机器学习算法,将历史故障率与资产类型、年龄、管道材料、直径、压力以及一系列地理相关属性(如土壤性质和气候事件)联系起来。该模型的输出允许完整性工程师考虑预测故障率,以补充用于制定完整性计划计划的滞后性能指标。该模型展示了使用可用的分配系统记录来开发基于历史的自定义预测模型的优势。还描述了配电网的后果估计。配电泄漏通常被划分为不同的危险级别,以区分操作响应。这些是根据事件数据记录和SME输入来分配的,以便为分布泄漏的后果开发一个事件树。本文总结了项目期间进行的分布资产失效概率及后果计算工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信