Performance of CAMS Radiation Service and HelioClim-3 databases of solar radiation at surface: evaluating the spatial variation in Germany

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald
{"title":"Performance of CAMS Radiation Service and HelioClim-3 databases of solar radiation at surface: evaluating the spatial variation in Germany","authors":"M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald","doi":"10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known\ndatabases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation\nService database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3\ndatabase version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from\nsatellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for\nthe period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany\noperated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the\ncorrelation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges\nbetween 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41 \nand 32 W m −2 ( −11  % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The\nstandard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and\n39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between\n0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between\n −22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6  % and 5 %), and between respectively\n70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,\noverestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North\nwith a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the\nHC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both\ndatabases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.","PeriodicalId":30081,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Science and Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known databases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation Service database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3 database version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from satellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for the period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany operated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the correlation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges between 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41 and 32 W m −2 ( −11  % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The standard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and 39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between 0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between −22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6  % and 5 %), and between respectively 70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database, overestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North with a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the HC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both databases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.
CAMS辐射服务和HelioClim-3地表太阳辐射数据库的性能:评价德国地区太阳辐射的空间变化
摘要目前的工作涉及两个著名的地面接收太阳辐射数据库的空间一致性:CAMS RadiationService数据库版本3.2,简称CAMS- rad和helioclim -3数据库版本5,简称HC3v5。这两个数据库都来自卫星图像。它们是根据德国气象局(DWD)运营的德国26个地面站网络记录的2010-2018年10分钟辐照度进行验证的。对于CAMS-Rad数据库,在所有天空条件下,地面测量值和估计值之间的相关系数在0.83到0.92之间。偏倚范围为- 41和32 W m - 2(平均辐照度的- 11%和10%)。标准偏差范围在89和129w m−2之间(25%和39%)。对于HC3v5数据库,相关系数在0.90 ~ 0.95之间。偏差和标准差分别在- 22 ~ 16 W m−2之间(- 6%和5%),70 ~ 104 W m−2之间(20%和31%)。对于CAMS Rad数据库,在南部观测到高估,在北部观测到低估,并且从东到西的偏差有微弱的增加趋势。对于hc3v5数据库,整个德国的偏见相当一致。两个数据库的标准差均没有明显的空间变化趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Science and Research
Advances in Science and Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信