A Survey of Korean Consumers' Awareness on Animal Welfare of Laying Hens

E. Hong, H. Kang, Ki‐Tae Park, Jin-Joo Jeon, Hyunsoo Kim, Chan-ho Kim, Sang-Ho Kim
{"title":"A Survey of Korean Consumers' Awareness on Animal Welfare of Laying Hens","authors":"E. Hong, H. Kang, Ki‐Tae Park, Jin-Joo Jeon, Hyunsoo Kim, Chan-ho Kim, Sang-Ho Kim","doi":"10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted twice to investigate egg purchase behavior and perception on animal welfare of Korean consumers. This study included women, who were the main decision makers and caretakers in the household, and men with one-person household. This survey was conducted with by the Computer Assisted Web Interview and Gang Survey methods. On the key considerations factor, the highest response rate was considered to be 'price', and the response rate of considering 'packing date' increased in the second survey. At a reasonable price based on 10 eggs, the response rate was the highest at 53.8% and 42.9% in both the first and second surveys and the appropriate price averages were 2,482 won and 2,132 won, respectively. The highest rate of purchase of egg consumers from 'Large Mart' followed by 'Medium sized supermarket' and 'Chain supermarket'. As for the awareness about animal welfare, the recognition ratio (73.5%) was higher in the result of the second survey than the first. The cognitive period of animal welfare was 59.0% before the insecticide egg crisis and 41.0% thereafter. Regarding whether or not they have ever seen an animal welfare certification mark and an animal welfare animal farm certification mark, 59.6% of respondents said that they saw it for the first time and 37.6% answered that they knew the animal welfare certification mark. On the animal welfare system, the 'free-range' response rate was the highest at 85.8%. The 'free-range' fit response decreased by 34.2%p, while the 'barn' and 'European type' fit response increased by 13.2%p and 24.1%p, respectively. The number of 'I have never seen' and 'I have ever eaten' responses to the recognition and eating experience of animal welfare certified eggs decreased while the number of those who answered 'Have ever seen' and 'Have eaten' increased. The answer of purchasing animal welfare certified eggs at department stores, organic farming cooperatives, and internet shopping malls was higher than that of buying conventional eggs. Of the total respondents, 92.0% were willing to purchase an animal welfare egg before the price was offered, but after offering the prices of animal welfare eggs, the intention to purchase was 62.7%, which was about 30%p lower than before. The reason for purchasing an animal welfare certified egg was the highest score of 71.0% for 'I think it is likely to be high in food safety', and 38.1% for 'I think the price is high' for lack of intention to purchase. In the sensory evaluation of animal welfare eggs, egg color and skin texture of conventional eggs were significantly higher than those of certified welfare eggs (P<0.05), and boiled eggs showed that egg whites of animal welfare certified eggs were more (P<0.05). As a result, the results of this study will contribute to the activation of the animal welfare certification system for laying hens by providing basic data on consumer awareness to animal welfare certified farmers. (","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study was conducted twice to investigate egg purchase behavior and perception on animal welfare of Korean consumers. This study included women, who were the main decision makers and caretakers in the household, and men with one-person household. This survey was conducted with by the Computer Assisted Web Interview and Gang Survey methods. On the key considerations factor, the highest response rate was considered to be 'price', and the response rate of considering 'packing date' increased in the second survey. At a reasonable price based on 10 eggs, the response rate was the highest at 53.8% and 42.9% in both the first and second surveys and the appropriate price averages were 2,482 won and 2,132 won, respectively. The highest rate of purchase of egg consumers from 'Large Mart' followed by 'Medium sized supermarket' and 'Chain supermarket'. As for the awareness about animal welfare, the recognition ratio (73.5%) was higher in the result of the second survey than the first. The cognitive period of animal welfare was 59.0% before the insecticide egg crisis and 41.0% thereafter. Regarding whether or not they have ever seen an animal welfare certification mark and an animal welfare animal farm certification mark, 59.6% of respondents said that they saw it for the first time and 37.6% answered that they knew the animal welfare certification mark. On the animal welfare system, the 'free-range' response rate was the highest at 85.8%. The 'free-range' fit response decreased by 34.2%p, while the 'barn' and 'European type' fit response increased by 13.2%p and 24.1%p, respectively. The number of 'I have never seen' and 'I have ever eaten' responses to the recognition and eating experience of animal welfare certified eggs decreased while the number of those who answered 'Have ever seen' and 'Have eaten' increased. The answer of purchasing animal welfare certified eggs at department stores, organic farming cooperatives, and internet shopping malls was higher than that of buying conventional eggs. Of the total respondents, 92.0% were willing to purchase an animal welfare egg before the price was offered, but after offering the prices of animal welfare eggs, the intention to purchase was 62.7%, which was about 30%p lower than before. The reason for purchasing an animal welfare certified egg was the highest score of 71.0% for 'I think it is likely to be high in food safety', and 38.1% for 'I think the price is high' for lack of intention to purchase. In the sensory evaluation of animal welfare eggs, egg color and skin texture of conventional eggs were significantly higher than those of certified welfare eggs (P<0.05), and boiled eggs showed that egg whites of animal welfare certified eggs were more (P<0.05). As a result, the results of this study will contribute to the activation of the animal welfare certification system for laying hens by providing basic data on consumer awareness to animal welfare certified farmers. (
韩国消费者对蛋鸡动物福利意识的调查
本研究对韩国消费者的鸡蛋购买行为和对动物福利的认知进行了两次调查。这项研究包括妇女,她们是家庭中的主要决策者和照顾者,以及只有一人家庭的男子。本调查采用电脑辅助网页访谈及小组调查方法进行。在主要考虑因素中,“价格”的回应率最高,而在第二次调查中,考虑“包装日期”的回应率有所上升。在以10个鸡蛋为标准的“合理价格”调查中,第1次和第2次的回答率分别为53.8%和42.9%,最高,平均价格分别为2482韩元和2132韩元。消费者购买鸡蛋的比例最高的是“大型超市”,其次是“中型超市”和“连锁超市”。在动物福利意识方面,第二次调查结果的认知率(73.5%)高于第一次调查结果。虫卵危机前对动物福利的认知度为59.0%,危机后为41.0%。对于是否见过动物福利认证标志和动物福利动物农场认证标志的问题,59.6%的受访者表示第一次看到,37.6%的受访者表示知道动物福利认证标志。在动物福利制度方面,回答“放养”的比例最高,为85.8%。“自由放养”的匹配反应下降了34.2%,而“谷仓”和“欧式”的匹配反应分别增加了13.2%和24.1%。对动物福利认证鸡蛋的认知度和食用经历,回答“没有见过”和“吃过”的人减少了,回答“见过”和“吃过”的人增加了。在百货店、有机农协、网上购物中心购买动物福利认证鸡蛋的回答比购买普通鸡蛋的回答要高。在所有受访者中,92.0%的人在提供价格之前愿意购买动物福利蛋,但在提供动物福利蛋的价格之后,购买意愿为62.7%,比之前降低了约30个百分点。购买动物福利认证鸡蛋的理由中,“我认为食品安全可能高”的占71.0%,而“我认为价格高”的占38.1%,因为没有购买意愿。在动物福利蛋感官评价中,普通蛋的蛋色和皮质感显著高于认证福利蛋(P<0.05),而煮蛋中,认证动物福利蛋的蛋清更多(P<0.05)。因此,本研究的结果将有助于激活蛋鸡动物福利认证制度,为获得动物福利认证的农民提供消费者意识的基本数据。(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信