Do Family Physicians and Internists Differ in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Reported Approaches for Depression?

J. Gallo, L. Meredith, J. Gonzales, L. Cooper, P. Nutting, D. Ford, L. Rubenstein, K. Rost, K. Wells
{"title":"Do Family Physicians and Internists Differ in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Reported Approaches for Depression?","authors":"J. Gallo, L. Meredith, J. Gonzales, L. Cooper, P. Nutting, D. Ford, L. Rubenstein, K. Rost, K. Wells","doi":"10.2190/7QNE-ENF5-2KEL-723X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the relationship of primary care specialty training with self-assessed skill, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward depression recognition and management. Method: A baseline self-report questionnaire was administered to 184 internists and 138 family physicians participating in a multisite depression intervention study. Results: There were no marked differences in knowledge of internists and family physicians regarding depression, in attitudes about the effectiveness of specific therapies, or in barriers to providing optimum treatment for depression. However, compared to internists, family physicians rated themselves as more skilled in the management of depression. When considering management of patients with moderate to severe depression, family physicians were more likely to report that they prescribed a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (relative odds (RO) = 3.51, 95 percent Confidence interval (CI) [2.19, 5.60] and to personally counsel patients (RO = 1.97, 95 percent CI [1.16, 3.38]) more than half the patients, but were less likely to refer to a specialist in mental health (RO = 0.52, 95 percent CI [0.33, 0.82]) than were internists. Additional potentially influential characteristics did not wholly account for the reported differences in practice according to specialty. Physicians of both specialties expressed considerable uncertainty in their knowledge of psychotherapy and in their evaluation of the effectiveness of other strategies for the prevention of recurrence of depression. Conclusion: Strategies to improve mental health care should account for the orientation of primary care physicians to mental health issues.","PeriodicalId":22510,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/7QNE-ENF5-2KEL-723X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the relationship of primary care specialty training with self-assessed skill, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward depression recognition and management. Method: A baseline self-report questionnaire was administered to 184 internists and 138 family physicians participating in a multisite depression intervention study. Results: There were no marked differences in knowledge of internists and family physicians regarding depression, in attitudes about the effectiveness of specific therapies, or in barriers to providing optimum treatment for depression. However, compared to internists, family physicians rated themselves as more skilled in the management of depression. When considering management of patients with moderate to severe depression, family physicians were more likely to report that they prescribed a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (relative odds (RO) = 3.51, 95 percent Confidence interval (CI) [2.19, 5.60] and to personally counsel patients (RO = 1.97, 95 percent CI [1.16, 3.38]) more than half the patients, but were less likely to refer to a specialist in mental health (RO = 0.52, 95 percent CI [0.33, 0.82]) than were internists. Additional potentially influential characteristics did not wholly account for the reported differences in practice according to specialty. Physicians of both specialties expressed considerable uncertainty in their knowledge of psychotherapy and in their evaluation of the effectiveness of other strategies for the prevention of recurrence of depression. Conclusion: Strategies to improve mental health care should account for the orientation of primary care physicians to mental health issues.
家庭医生和内科医生在抑郁症的知识、态度和自我报告方法上有差异吗?
目的:本调查的目的是评估初级保健专业培训与自我评估的技能、知识、态度和行为对抑郁症的认识和管理的关系。方法:对184名内科医生和138名家庭医生进行基线自我报告问卷调查。结果:在内科医生和家庭医生对抑郁症的知识、对特定治疗方法有效性的态度以及提供最佳抑郁症治疗的障碍方面,没有显著差异。然而,与内科医生相比,家庭医生认为自己在处理抑郁症方面更熟练。当考虑到对中度至重度抑郁症患者的管理时,家庭医生更有可能报告他们开了选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(相对优势(RO) = 3.51, 95%可信区间(CI)[2.19, 5.60],并对超过一半的患者进行了个人咨询(RO = 1.97, 95% CI[1.16, 3.38]),但与内科医生相比,他们更不可能转诊心理健康专家(RO = 0.52, 95% CI[0.33, 0.82])。其他潜在的影响特征并不能完全解释根据专业报告的实践差异。这两个专业的医生在他们的心理治疗知识和他们对预防抑郁症复发的其他策略的有效性的评估中都表达了相当大的不确定性。结论:改善心理卫生保健的策略应考虑到初级保健医生对心理健康问题的定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信