Privacy, Free Speech and Content Moderation: A Literature Review and Constitutional Framework Analysis

Yi Wu
{"title":"Privacy, Free Speech and Content Moderation: A Literature Review and Constitutional Framework Analysis","authors":"Yi Wu","doi":"10.56397/ist.2022.11.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Content moderation is one of the lifeblood of Internet platform companies. Concealment and innovation coexist. The United States and the European Union are leading the world in the field of human rights protection in content moderation. Both the text of the Constitution and the jurisprudence have formed a relatively complete framework of protection. Public and private sectors, online and offline communities, and the balance between ex-ante and ex-post, are at the intersection of content moderation with privacy and free speech. We need to further research exploring the design of the online moderation model, which will balance the arguments around policy, human rights law, and the need to make online spaces safer for a world-wide diverse population.","PeriodicalId":20688,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/ist.2022.11.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Content moderation is one of the lifeblood of Internet platform companies. Concealment and innovation coexist. The United States and the European Union are leading the world in the field of human rights protection in content moderation. Both the text of the Constitution and the jurisprudence have formed a relatively complete framework of protection. Public and private sectors, online and offline communities, and the balance between ex-ante and ex-post, are at the intersection of content moderation with privacy and free speech. We need to further research exploring the design of the online moderation model, which will balance the arguments around policy, human rights law, and the need to make online spaces safer for a world-wide diverse population.
隐私、言论自由与内容节制:文献回顾与宪法框架分析
内容审核是互联网平台公司的命脉之一。隐藏与创新并存。美国和欧盟在内容审查的人权保护领域处于世界领先地位。无论是宪法文本还是法理,都形成了较为完整的保护框架。公共和私营部门,线上和线下社区,以及事前和事后之间的平衡,都处于内容节制与隐私和言论自由的交叉点。我们需要进一步研究探索网络节制模式的设计,这将平衡围绕政策、人权法和为世界各地不同人口提供更安全的网络空间的需求的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信