Evaluation of different extractors of features at the level of sentiment analysis

IF 0.9 Q4 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Fatima Es-Sabery, Khadija Es-Sabery, Hamid Garmani, Junaid Qadir, Abdellatif Hair
{"title":"Evaluation of different extractors of features at the level of sentiment analysis","authors":"Fatima Es-Sabery, Khadija Es-Sabery, Hamid Garmani, Junaid Qadir, Abdellatif Hair","doi":"10.36244/icj.2022.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis is the process of recognizing and categorizing the emotions being expressed in a textual source. Tweets are commonly used to generate a large amount of sentiment data after they are analyzed. These feelings data help to learn about people's thoughts on a various range of topics. People are typically attracted for researching positive and negative reviews, which contain dislikes and likes, shared by the consumers concerning the features of a certain service or product. Therefore, the aspects or features of the product/ service play an important role in opinion mining. Furthermore to enough work being carried out in text mining, feature extraction in opinion mining is presently becoming a hot research field. In this paper, we focus on the study of feature extractors because of their importance in classification performance. The feature extraction is the most critical aspect of opinion classification since classification efficiency can be degraded if features are not properly chosen. A few scientific researchers have addressed the issue of feature extraction. And we found in the literature that almost every article deals with one or two feature extractors. For that, we decided in this paper to cover all the most popular feature extractors which are BOW, N-grams, TF-IDF, Word2vec, GloVe and FastText. In general, this paper will discuss the existing feature extractors in the opinion mining domain. Also, it will present the advantages and the inconveniences of each extractor. Moreover, a comparative study is performed for determining the most efficient combination CNN/extractor in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 measure.","PeriodicalId":42504,"journal":{"name":"Infocommunications Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infocommunications Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36244/icj.2022.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is the process of recognizing and categorizing the emotions being expressed in a textual source. Tweets are commonly used to generate a large amount of sentiment data after they are analyzed. These feelings data help to learn about people's thoughts on a various range of topics. People are typically attracted for researching positive and negative reviews, which contain dislikes and likes, shared by the consumers concerning the features of a certain service or product. Therefore, the aspects or features of the product/ service play an important role in opinion mining. Furthermore to enough work being carried out in text mining, feature extraction in opinion mining is presently becoming a hot research field. In this paper, we focus on the study of feature extractors because of their importance in classification performance. The feature extraction is the most critical aspect of opinion classification since classification efficiency can be degraded if features are not properly chosen. A few scientific researchers have addressed the issue of feature extraction. And we found in the literature that almost every article deals with one or two feature extractors. For that, we decided in this paper to cover all the most popular feature extractors which are BOW, N-grams, TF-IDF, Word2vec, GloVe and FastText. In general, this paper will discuss the existing feature extractors in the opinion mining domain. Also, it will present the advantages and the inconveniences of each extractor. Moreover, a comparative study is performed for determining the most efficient combination CNN/extractor in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 measure.
在情感分析水平上对不同特征提取器的评价
情感分析是对文本中所表达的情感进行识别和分类的过程。Tweets通常被用于分析后生成大量的情绪数据。这些情感数据有助于了解人们对各种话题的想法。人们通常会被研究积极和消极的评论所吸引,这些评论包含了消费者对某种服务或产品的特点所分享的不喜欢和喜欢。因此,产品/服务的方面或特征在意见挖掘中起着重要的作用。此外,随着文本挖掘的深入,观点挖掘中的特征提取也逐渐成为研究的热点。由于特征提取器对分类性能的重要性,本文重点研究了特征提取器。特征提取是意见分类中最关键的方面,如果特征选择不当会降低分类效率。一些科研人员已经解决了特征提取的问题。我们在文献中发现几乎每篇文章都涉及到一个或两个特征提取器。为此,我们决定在本文中涵盖所有最流行的特征提取器,即BOW, N-grams, TF-IDF, Word2vec, GloVe和FastText。总的来说,本文将讨论意见挖掘领域中现有的特征提取器。并介绍了各种萃取器的优缺点。此外,在准确度、精密度、召回率和F1度量方面,进行了比较研究,以确定最有效的CNN/提取器组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infocommunications Journal
Infocommunications Journal TELECOMMUNICATIONS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信