{"title":"Causes and safety effects of production disturbances in FMS installations: A comparison of field survey studies in the USA and Finland","authors":"Jari Järvinen, Vesa Vannas, Markku Mattila, Waldemar Karwowski","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7111(199624)6:1<57::AID-HFM5>3.0.CO;2-J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Installation and operation of flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs) requires a relatively large investment of capital. Therefore, high utilization of manufacturing capacity and low downtime due to system disturbances are of great importance. In addition to productivity and quality, the production disturbances have an effect on the safety of the personnel involved in operating and maintaining the FMS installations. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the causes of production disturbances and their effects on the operation and safety performance of the FMS installations, (2) to analyze and compare disturbance data for the FMS installations in the U.S. and Finland, and (3) to identify ways to improve safety and efficiency in FMS implementations. The survey included 14 FMS installations in the U.S. and 31 FMS installations in Finland. The field survey questionnaire included six sections: (1) background information, (2) planning, (3) performance, (4) organization, (5) training, and (6) production disturbance situations. The analysis of system disturbances was based on the data about 35 disturbances reported in the FMS installations in the U.S. and 52 FMS-related disturbances in Finland. About 12% of all the disturbances observed in the U.S. and 35% of the disturbances in Finland caused hazardous situations or accidents. The FMS disturbances were classified into design errors, component failures, human errors, and external factors. More than one-third (34%) of the disturbances in the U.S. and in Finland (35%) were mainly caused by system design-based errors or flaws. The study results illustrate the scope of safety problems experienced in the implementation and use of flexible manufacturing systems, and provide new field data that are not systematically collected and classified today. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":100698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing","volume":"6 1","pages":"57-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7111(199624)6:1<57::AID-HFM5>3.0.CO;2-J","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7111%28199624%296%3A1%3C57%3A%3AAID-HFM5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Installation and operation of flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs) requires a relatively large investment of capital. Therefore, high utilization of manufacturing capacity and low downtime due to system disturbances are of great importance. In addition to productivity and quality, the production disturbances have an effect on the safety of the personnel involved in operating and maintaining the FMS installations. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the causes of production disturbances and their effects on the operation and safety performance of the FMS installations, (2) to analyze and compare disturbance data for the FMS installations in the U.S. and Finland, and (3) to identify ways to improve safety and efficiency in FMS implementations. The survey included 14 FMS installations in the U.S. and 31 FMS installations in Finland. The field survey questionnaire included six sections: (1) background information, (2) planning, (3) performance, (4) organization, (5) training, and (6) production disturbance situations. The analysis of system disturbances was based on the data about 35 disturbances reported in the FMS installations in the U.S. and 52 FMS-related disturbances in Finland. About 12% of all the disturbances observed in the U.S. and 35% of the disturbances in Finland caused hazardous situations or accidents. The FMS disturbances were classified into design errors, component failures, human errors, and external factors. More than one-third (34%) of the disturbances in the U.S. and in Finland (35%) were mainly caused by system design-based errors or flaws. The study results illustrate the scope of safety problems experienced in the implementation and use of flexible manufacturing systems, and provide new field data that are not systematically collected and classified today. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
FMS设备生产干扰的原因和安全影响:美国和芬兰实地调查研究的比较
柔性制造系统(fms)的安装和运行需要相对较大的资金投入。因此,制造能力的高利用率和低因系统干扰而导致的停机时间是非常重要的。除了生产力和质量外,生产干扰还会影响操作和维护FMS设备的人员的安全。本研究的目的是:(1)确定生产干扰的原因及其对FMS装置运行和安全性能的影响,(2)分析和比较美国和芬兰FMS装置的干扰数据,(3)确定提高FMS实施安全性和效率的方法。该调查包括美国的14个FMS安装和芬兰的31个FMS安装。现场调查问卷包括六个部分:(1)背景资料,(2)计划,(3)绩效,(4)组织,(5)培训,(6)生产干扰情况。系统干扰的分析是基于美国FMS安装中报告的35个干扰和芬兰FMS相关的52个干扰的数据。在美国观察到的所有骚乱中,约有12%和芬兰35%的骚乱造成了危险情况或事故。将FMS干扰分为设计错误、部件故障、人为错误和外部因素。在美国和芬兰,超过三分之一(34%)的干扰主要是由基于系统设计的错误或缺陷引起的。研究结果说明了在实施和使用柔性制造系统时遇到的安全问题的范围,并提供了目前尚未系统收集和分类的新现场数据。©1996 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。