Pandemic as a Challenge to Subjective Well-Being: Anxiety and Coping

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
E. Rasskazova, D. Leontiev, A. Lebedeva
{"title":"Pandemic as a Challenge to Subjective Well-Being: Anxiety and Coping","authors":"E. Rasskazova, D. Leontiev, A. Lebedeva","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2020280205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on the pandemic today assumes that this situation is stressful and requires coping. The aim was to study subjective well-being in the situation of the pandemic and its relationship to coping and anxiety about coronavirus. 409 people filled Satisfaction With Life Scale, Scale of Positive And Negative Experiences, situational version of COPE, checklists assessing anxiety of infection and anxiety of the negative consequences of the pandemic. The comparison groups were three samples of 98, 66 and 293 people who filled Satisfaction With Life Scale and Scale of Positive And Negative Experiences in 2017 and 2019. There was a lower level of positive emotions among respondents in a situation of self-isolation, but the same level of satisfaction with life and negative emotions. Anxiety about the pandemic is related to higher negative emotions only. Emotionally oriented coping strategies and mental disengagement are associated with a higher level of pandemic anxiety. Problem-oriented and active coping strategies are weakly associated with lower anxiety that could be explained by the lack of ready effective methods of resolving this new and uncertain situation. Anxiety associated with current, acute and imminent risk (such as risk of infection), concentration on emotions and acceptance may not be dysfunctional strategies, as they are not associated with deterioration in overall well-being. On the contrary, attempts to cope with anxiety regarding negative consequences of a pandemic by mental disengagement, substance use and denial are associated with a lower level of satisfaction with life.","PeriodicalId":43458,"journal":{"name":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Most research on the pandemic today assumes that this situation is stressful and requires coping. The aim was to study subjective well-being in the situation of the pandemic and its relationship to coping and anxiety about coronavirus. 409 people filled Satisfaction With Life Scale, Scale of Positive And Negative Experiences, situational version of COPE, checklists assessing anxiety of infection and anxiety of the negative consequences of the pandemic. The comparison groups were three samples of 98, 66 and 293 people who filled Satisfaction With Life Scale and Scale of Positive And Negative Experiences in 2017 and 2019. There was a lower level of positive emotions among respondents in a situation of self-isolation, but the same level of satisfaction with life and negative emotions. Anxiety about the pandemic is related to higher negative emotions only. Emotionally oriented coping strategies and mental disengagement are associated with a higher level of pandemic anxiety. Problem-oriented and active coping strategies are weakly associated with lower anxiety that could be explained by the lack of ready effective methods of resolving this new and uncertain situation. Anxiety associated with current, acute and imminent risk (such as risk of infection), concentration on emotions and acceptance may not be dysfunctional strategies, as they are not associated with deterioration in overall well-being. On the contrary, attempts to cope with anxiety regarding negative consequences of a pandemic by mental disengagement, substance use and denial are associated with a lower level of satisfaction with life.
流行病是对主观幸福感的挑战:焦虑和应对
今天,大多数关于这一流行病的研究都认为,这种情况令人感到压力,需要加以应对。目的是研究大流行情况下的主观幸福感及其与冠状病毒应对和焦虑的关系。409人填写了生活满意度量表、积极和消极经历量表、情景版COPE、评估感染焦虑和对大流行负面后果焦虑的清单。对照组为2017年和2019年填写生活满意度量表和积极与消极经历量表的98人、66人和293人三个样本。自我孤立情境下的积极情绪水平较低,但对生活的满意度和消极情绪水平相同。对大流行的焦虑只与较高的负面情绪有关。以情绪为导向的应对策略和精神脱离与更高程度的流行病焦虑有关。问题导向和积极应对策略与较低的焦虑程度弱相关,这可以解释为缺乏现成的有效方法来解决这种新的和不确定的情况。与当前、急性和迫在眉睫的风险(如感染风险)、专注于情绪和接受相关的焦虑可能不是功能失调的策略,因为它们与整体幸福感的恶化无关。相反,试图通过精神脱离、药物使用和拒绝来应对对流行病负面后果的焦虑,与生活满意度较低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信