Influence of different level of concentrate feeding on the productive performances and meat quality attributes of indigenous lamb

Meat Research Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.55002/mr.3.2.54
M. Hashem, MM Maruf, M. Haque, S. Akhter, M. Arafath, MM Rahman
{"title":"Influence of different level of concentrate feeding on the productive performances and meat quality attributes of indigenous lamb","authors":"M. Hashem, MM Maruf, M. Haque, S. Akhter, M. Arafath, MM Rahman","doi":"10.55002/mr.3.2.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the optimum level of concentrate feeds on the productive performances and meat quality attributes of three genotypes of indigenous lambs of Bangladesh. Thirty-six selected lambs of three genotype were divided into four treatments such as T0 (Without concentrate supplementation), T1 (1% concentrate feed), T2 (1.5% concentrate feed) and T3 (2% concentrate feed) having three lambs per treatment of three genotypes. The data were analyzed through 4 × 3 factorial experiments in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with SAS software. Initial body weight (IBW), average daily gain (ADG) and final body weight (FBW) showed significantly (p<0.001) higher values at different Genotype with increasing level of concentrate feed. Hot carcass weight (HCW) was significantly (p<0.001) increased in different treatments. The crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) values were significantly increased (p<0.05) among different treatments. Genotype had a significant (p<0.001) effect on proximate components of meat except ether extract (EE). The ultimate pH was significantly (p<0.001) high in T0, T1 and T3 Treatment. Cooked pH was significantly (p<0.001) optimum in case of BRL compared to CBL and JBL. Cooking loss (CL %) had insignificantly reduced except T3 treatment. Drip loss was significantly different in different genotype. The score of color, flavor juiciness and overall acceptability were significantly different (p<0.001) in different genotype. Flavor and tenderness score were significantly increased (p<0.001) in different treatments except T2. The color values L* and b* had significantly changed (p<0.001) and a* value was found insignificantly higher in all treatments. Hence, the study reflects the superiority of Coastal Belt lamb over Jamuna Basin lamb and Barind Region lamb in terms of overall productive performance. Meat quality traits largely varied in different concentrate level. Jamuna Basin lamb with 1.5% concentrate feed showed better performances in nutritional, physicochemical, sensory, and instrumental color values of lamb meat.","PeriodicalId":18312,"journal":{"name":"Meat Research","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.3.2.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the optimum level of concentrate feeds on the productive performances and meat quality attributes of three genotypes of indigenous lambs of Bangladesh. Thirty-six selected lambs of three genotype were divided into four treatments such as T0 (Without concentrate supplementation), T1 (1% concentrate feed), T2 (1.5% concentrate feed) and T3 (2% concentrate feed) having three lambs per treatment of three genotypes. The data were analyzed through 4 × 3 factorial experiments in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with SAS software. Initial body weight (IBW), average daily gain (ADG) and final body weight (FBW) showed significantly (p<0.001) higher values at different Genotype with increasing level of concentrate feed. Hot carcass weight (HCW) was significantly (p<0.001) increased in different treatments. The crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) values were significantly increased (p<0.05) among different treatments. Genotype had a significant (p<0.001) effect on proximate components of meat except ether extract (EE). The ultimate pH was significantly (p<0.001) high in T0, T1 and T3 Treatment. Cooked pH was significantly (p<0.001) optimum in case of BRL compared to CBL and JBL. Cooking loss (CL %) had insignificantly reduced except T3 treatment. Drip loss was significantly different in different genotype. The score of color, flavor juiciness and overall acceptability were significantly different (p<0.001) in different genotype. Flavor and tenderness score were significantly increased (p<0.001) in different treatments except T2. The color values L* and b* had significantly changed (p<0.001) and a* value was found insignificantly higher in all treatments. Hence, the study reflects the superiority of Coastal Belt lamb over Jamuna Basin lamb and Barind Region lamb in terms of overall productive performance. Meat quality traits largely varied in different concentrate level. Jamuna Basin lamb with 1.5% concentrate feed showed better performances in nutritional, physicochemical, sensory, and instrumental color values of lamb meat.
不同精料饲喂水平对地方羔羊生产性能和肉品质的影响
本研究旨在确定三种基因型孟加拉国本地羔羊生产性能和肉质性状的最佳精饲料水平。选取3种基因型羔羊36只,分为T0(不添加精料)、T1(1%精料饲料)、T2(1.5%精料饲料)和T3(2%精料饲料)4个处理,每个处理3只羔羊。采用完全随机设计(CRD),采用SAS软件进行4 × 3析因试验。初始体重(IBW)、平均日增重(ADG)和末体重(FBW)在不同基因型中均随精料水平的升高而显著升高(p<0.001)。热胴体重(HCW)在不同处理下显著升高(p<0.001)。不同处理显著提高了粗蛋白质(CP)和粗脂肪(EE)值(p<0.05)。基因型对肉中除粗脂肪(EE)外的其他成分有显著影响(p<0.001)。最终pH值在T0、T1和T3处理时显著升高(p<0.001)。与CBL和JBL相比,BRL的煮熟pH显著(p<0.001)最佳。除T3处理外,蒸煮损失(CL %)无显著降低。滴漏损失在不同基因型间差异显著。颜色、风味、多汁性和总体可接受性得分在不同基因型间差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。除T2外,不同处理的风味和嫩度评分均显著升高(p<0.001)。颜色值L*和b*发生了显著变化(p<0.001), a*值在所有处理中均无显著升高。因此,本研究反映了海岸带羔羊在综合生产性能方面优于贾穆纳盆地羔羊和巴林德地区羔羊。不同精料水平肉质性状差异较大。添加1.5%精料的贾穆纳盆地羔羊在肉质营养、理化、感官和仪器色值方面表现出较好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信