What Should Good Bereavement Support in Palliative Care Look Like?: Findings from workshop group discussions

Q3 Nursing
H. Scott, S. Sivell, M. Longo, K. Seddon, J. Fitzgibbon, A. Nelson, A. Byrne, E. Harrop
{"title":"What Should Good Bereavement Support in Palliative Care Look Like?: Findings from workshop group discussions","authors":"H. Scott, S. Sivell, M. Longo, K. Seddon, J. Fitzgibbon, A. Nelson, A. Byrne, E. Harrop","doi":"10.54210/bj.2022.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is a lack of consistency in approaches to bereavement support provision and evaluation. This study identified outcomes for adult bereavement support in palliative care, involving a workshop with people from professional and lived experience backgrounds, providing a view on what support interventions should look like. \nAims: The aims of the workshop were to gather stakeholder views on the purpose and impacts of bereavement support and what outcomes should be used in the design and evaluation of bereavement interventions and services.  \nMethods: Stakeholders were divided into three groups and asked to identify and discuss how support services should help bereaved service users and what good bereavement support looks like. Key themes were identified from the written and verbal content of the consensus day. \nFindings: Three main themes emerged from the data; informal support and self-management; the aims and purpose of formal bereavement service support and the timing, accessibility and quality of support. \nConclusion: Workshop findings align with public health models of bereavement care and recent service standards, identifying core support functions and aspirations for bereavement services. Finding the best mechanisms and modalities for meeting these, in the context of the late/post-pandemic period, presents both challenges and opportunities.","PeriodicalId":44115,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54210/bj.2022.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a lack of consistency in approaches to bereavement support provision and evaluation. This study identified outcomes for adult bereavement support in palliative care, involving a workshop with people from professional and lived experience backgrounds, providing a view on what support interventions should look like. Aims: The aims of the workshop were to gather stakeholder views on the purpose and impacts of bereavement support and what outcomes should be used in the design and evaluation of bereavement interventions and services.  Methods: Stakeholders were divided into three groups and asked to identify and discuss how support services should help bereaved service users and what good bereavement support looks like. Key themes were identified from the written and verbal content of the consensus day. Findings: Three main themes emerged from the data; informal support and self-management; the aims and purpose of formal bereavement service support and the timing, accessibility and quality of support. Conclusion: Workshop findings align with public health models of bereavement care and recent service standards, identifying core support functions and aspirations for bereavement services. Finding the best mechanisms and modalities for meeting these, in the context of the late/post-pandemic period, presents both challenges and opportunities.
在姑息治疗中,好的丧亲支持应该是什么样的?:工作坊小组讨论的结果
导言:在提供丧亲支持和评估的方法上缺乏一致性。本研究确定了姑息治疗中成人丧亲支持的结果,包括一个由专业和生活经验背景的人组成的研讨会,提供了支持干预措施应该是什么样子的观点。目的:讲习班的目的是收集利益攸关方对丧亲支助的目的和影响的意见,以及在设计和评价丧亲干预措施和服务时应采用何种结果。方法:将利益相关者分为三组,并要求确定和讨论支持服务应如何帮助失去亲人的服务用户,以及良好的丧亲支持是什么样子的。从协商一致日的书面和口头内容中确定了关键主题。研究发现:数据中出现了三个主要主题;非正式支持和自我管理;正式丧亲服务支持的目标和目的以及支持的时间、可及性和质量。结论:讲习班的研究结果与丧亲护理的公共卫生模式和最近的服务标准相一致,确定了丧亲服务的核心支持功能和愿望。在大流行病后期/后时期,寻找满足这些需求的最佳机制和方式,既是挑战,也是机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bereavement Care
Bereavement Care SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信