Black carbon instead of particle mass concentration as an indication for the traffic related particles in the Brussels capital region

P. Vanderstraeten, M. Forton, O. Brasseur, Z. Offer
{"title":"Black carbon instead of particle mass concentration as an indication for the traffic related particles in the Brussels capital region","authors":"P. Vanderstraeten, M. Forton, O. Brasseur, Z. Offer","doi":"10.4236/JEP.2011.25060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brussels Capital Region has difficulties in meeting the stringent EU daily limit value for PM10 in all its measuring sites. Postponing the attainment of the deadline was not granted by the EU Commission, mainly due to insufficient judged measures to reduce road traffic emissions. However, a thorough analysis of the data makes clear that neither the particle mass concentration (PM10 and PM2.5) nor the particle number concentration are specific metrics for evaluating the particle pollution originated by traffic. In fact, increased formation of secondary aerosol, together with adverse meteorological conditions and the (re) suspension of the coarser fraction are by far the three main explanations for the numerous PM10 exceeding values. From our experience, amongst the particles measured, only the results for Black Carbon (BC), mainly present in the lower submicron range, are reflective of the direct influence of local traffic. Measured at two traffic sites along with PM mass and number concentrations, the data for Black Carbon show a striking correlation with nitrogen monoxide, a parameter strongly related with the proximity of the local traffic. The correlation factor between Black Carbon data and NO or NOX is much higher than between Black Carbon and the PM mass or number concentration. Therefore the assessment of traffic related particles should consider Black Carbon rather than PM10 or PM2.5.","PeriodicalId":7448,"journal":{"name":"Agro-environmental Protection","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro-environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JEP.2011.25060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The Brussels Capital Region has difficulties in meeting the stringent EU daily limit value for PM10 in all its measuring sites. Postponing the attainment of the deadline was not granted by the EU Commission, mainly due to insufficient judged measures to reduce road traffic emissions. However, a thorough analysis of the data makes clear that neither the particle mass concentration (PM10 and PM2.5) nor the particle number concentration are specific metrics for evaluating the particle pollution originated by traffic. In fact, increased formation of secondary aerosol, together with adverse meteorological conditions and the (re) suspension of the coarser fraction are by far the three main explanations for the numerous PM10 exceeding values. From our experience, amongst the particles measured, only the results for Black Carbon (BC), mainly present in the lower submicron range, are reflective of the direct influence of local traffic. Measured at two traffic sites along with PM mass and number concentrations, the data for Black Carbon show a striking correlation with nitrogen monoxide, a parameter strongly related with the proximity of the local traffic. The correlation factor between Black Carbon data and NO or NOX is much higher than between Black Carbon and the PM mass or number concentration. Therefore the assessment of traffic related particles should consider Black Carbon rather than PM10 or PM2.5.
黑碳代替颗粒质量浓度作为布鲁塞尔首都地区交通相关颗粒的指示
布鲁塞尔首都大区的所有测量点都难以达到欧盟严格的PM10日限值。欧盟委员会没有批准推迟最后期限的实现,主要是由于减少道路交通排放的判断措施不足。然而,对数据的深入分析表明,无论是颗粒物质量浓度(PM10和PM2.5)还是颗粒物数量浓度都不是评估交通颗粒物污染的具体指标。事实上,二次气溶胶的形成增加,不利的气象条件和(重新)悬浮较粗的部分是迄今为止PM10大量超标的三个主要解释。根据我们的经验,在测量的颗粒中,只有黑碳(BC)的结果反映了当地交通的直接影响,黑碳主要存在于较低的亚微米范围内。在两个交通站点以及PM质量和数字浓度的测量中,黑碳的数据显示出与一氧化氮的显著相关性,一氧化氮是一个与当地交通密切相关的参数。黑炭数据与NO或NOX的相关系数远高于黑炭与PM质量或数量浓度的相关系数。因此,交通相关颗粒物的评估应该考虑黑碳,而不是PM10或PM2.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信