A circular economy for electric vehicle batteries: driving the change

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
J. Ahuja, L. Dawson, Robert Lee
{"title":"A circular economy for electric vehicle batteries: driving the change","authors":"J. Ahuja, L. Dawson, Robert Lee","doi":"10.1108/jppel-02-2020-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWith the UK’s accelerating plans to transition to electric mobility, this paper aims to highlight the need for policies to prepare for appropriate management of electric vehicle (EV) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) as they reach the end of their life.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a regulatory review based on projections of EV LIBs coming off the market and associated problems of waste management together with the development of a servitisation model.\n\n\nFindings\nCircular economy in EV LIBs is unlikely to shape itself because LIB recycling is challenging and still in development. LIB volumes are insufficient for recycling to be currently profitable, and a circular economy here will need to be driven by regulatory intervention. Ignoring the problem carries potentially high environmental and health costs. This paper offers potential solutions through new EV ownership models to facilitate a circular economy.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe authors suggest a new EV ownership model. However, despite environmental benefits, re-shaping the fundamentals of market economies can have disruptive effects on current markets. Therefore, further exploration of this topic is needed. Also, the data presented is based on future projections of EV markets, battery lifespan, etc., which are uncertain at present. These are to be taken as estimates only.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper proposes regulatory interventions or incentives to fundamentally change consumer ideas of property ownership for EVs, so that EV automotive batteries remain the property of the manufacturer even when the consumer owns the car.\n","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-02-2020-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Purpose With the UK’s accelerating plans to transition to electric mobility, this paper aims to highlight the need for policies to prepare for appropriate management of electric vehicle (EV) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) as they reach the end of their life. Design/methodology/approach This is a regulatory review based on projections of EV LIBs coming off the market and associated problems of waste management together with the development of a servitisation model. Findings Circular economy in EV LIBs is unlikely to shape itself because LIB recycling is challenging and still in development. LIB volumes are insufficient for recycling to be currently profitable, and a circular economy here will need to be driven by regulatory intervention. Ignoring the problem carries potentially high environmental and health costs. This paper offers potential solutions through new EV ownership models to facilitate a circular economy. Research limitations/implications The authors suggest a new EV ownership model. However, despite environmental benefits, re-shaping the fundamentals of market economies can have disruptive effects on current markets. Therefore, further exploration of this topic is needed. Also, the data presented is based on future projections of EV markets, battery lifespan, etc., which are uncertain at present. These are to be taken as estimates only. Originality/value The paper proposes regulatory interventions or incentives to fundamentally change consumer ideas of property ownership for EVs, so that EV automotive batteries remain the property of the manufacturer even when the consumer owns the car.
电动汽车电池的循环经济:推动变革
随着英国加速向电动汽车过渡的计划,本文旨在强调制定政策的必要性,为电动汽车(EV)锂离子电池(lib)的适当管理做好准备,因为它们达到了寿命的终点。设计/方法/方法这是一项法规审查,基于对EV lib退出市场的预测,以及与废物管理相关的问题,以及服务化模式的发展。电动汽车锂电池的循环经济不太可能形成,因为锂电池的回收具有挑战性,而且仍在发展中。目前,锂离子电池的数量不足以使回收盈利,这里的循环经济需要监管干预的推动。忽视这个问题可能会带来高昂的环境和健康成本。本文提出了通过新的电动汽车所有权模式促进循环经济的潜在解决方案。研究局限性/启示作者提出了一种新的电动汽车所有权模型。然而,尽管对环境有利,但重新塑造市场经济的基本面可能对当前市场产生破坏性影响。因此,需要对这一课题进行进一步的探索。此外,所提供的数据是基于电动汽车市场的未来预测,电池寿命等,目前还不确定。这些只是估计数字。本文提出监管干预或激励措施,从根本上改变消费者对电动汽车所有权的观念,使电动汽车电池即使在消费者拥有汽车的情况下仍然是制造商的财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信