Horizontal inequality in the transition to upper secondary education in Spain

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Manuel T. Valdés
{"title":"Horizontal inequality in the transition to upper secondary education in Spain","authors":"Manuel T. Valdés","doi":"10.5565/rev/papers.2968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectively maintained inequality theory posits that a reduction in vertical inequality following the expansion of a level of education will be compensated by an increase in horizontal inequality. Although this theory has been intensely studied in various countries, it has barely been explored in the Spanish case. To fill this gap, I use data from the Survey on the Transition from Education/Training to Labour Market Insertion and analyse the sample of students who completed compulsory education in 2001, right after the expansion of upper secondary education (baccalaureate) in Spain. I study two forms of horizontal inequality: the type of education enrolled in (including which modality is preferred in the academic track) and the time for completion of the academic track. I report that the saturation of baccalaureate in the choice against vocational education triggered substantial inequalities in the preference for the most rewarding modalities of baccalaureate: socioeconomically advantaged students preferred the natural sciences and technology, while disadvantaged students preferred the social sciences, humanities, and arts. In turn, inequality in the time for completion of baccalaureate is mostly vertical as the two most likely results for all socioeconomic groups are to complete baccalaureate in two years or not complete it at all.","PeriodicalId":46175,"journal":{"name":"Papers-Revista de Sociologia","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers-Revista de Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectively maintained inequality theory posits that a reduction in vertical inequality following the expansion of a level of education will be compensated by an increase in horizontal inequality. Although this theory has been intensely studied in various countries, it has barely been explored in the Spanish case. To fill this gap, I use data from the Survey on the Transition from Education/Training to Labour Market Insertion and analyse the sample of students who completed compulsory education in 2001, right after the expansion of upper secondary education (baccalaureate) in Spain. I study two forms of horizontal inequality: the type of education enrolled in (including which modality is preferred in the academic track) and the time for completion of the academic track. I report that the saturation of baccalaureate in the choice against vocational education triggered substantial inequalities in the preference for the most rewarding modalities of baccalaureate: socioeconomically advantaged students preferred the natural sciences and technology, while disadvantaged students preferred the social sciences, humanities, and arts. In turn, inequality in the time for completion of baccalaureate is mostly vertical as the two most likely results for all socioeconomic groups are to complete baccalaureate in two years or not complete it at all.
西班牙向高中教育过渡中的横向不平等
有效维持不平等理论认为,随着教育水平的提高,纵向不平等的减少将被横向不平等的增加所补偿。尽管这一理论在许多国家都得到了广泛的研究,但在西班牙的案例中却很少有人对此进行探讨。为了填补这一空白,我使用了从教育/培训到劳动力市场插入过渡调查的数据,并分析了2001年完成义务教育的学生样本,就在西班牙高中教育(学士学位)扩大之后。我研究了两种形式的横向不平等:所接受的教育类型(包括在学术轨道上更倾向于哪种模式)和完成学术轨道的时间。我报告说,与职业教育相比,学士学位的选择饱和引发了对最有回报的学士学位模式的偏好的实质性不平等:社会经济条件优越的学生更喜欢自然科学和技术,而社会经济条件不利的学生更喜欢社会科学、人文和艺术。反过来,完成学士学位所需时间的不平等基本上是垂直的,因为对所有社会经济群体来说,最可能的两种结果是在两年内完成学士学位或根本不完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信