Effect of Different Etching Modes on Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Enamel

N. Haider, R. Nagpal, U. Singh, M. Umar, Nida Mehmood
{"title":"Effect of Different Etching Modes on Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Enamel","authors":"N. Haider, R. Nagpal, U. Singh, M. Umar, Nida Mehmood","doi":"10.12974/2311-8695.2021.09.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effect of different etching modes on the bonding efficacy of two universal adhesives to enamel. \nMaterials and method: The study was performed in fifty five extracted human molar teeth. For shear bond strength testing, flat buccal surfaces were prepared. Teeth were randomly divided into five experimental groups according to two universal adhesives Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, U.S.A) and Tetric N-Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) used in different etching modes i.e etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode and one control group of etch & rinse adhesive (Adper Single bond-2). Teeth were mounted in self-cure acrylic resin and composite restorations were placed in all the samples after application of adhesives according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ten samples from each group were subjected to shear bond strength evaluation. Additionally one sample per group was subjected to scanning electron microscopic analysis for observing resin-enamel interfacial adaptation. \nStatistical analysis: Data collected was subjected to statistical analysis using one –way ANOVA and post-hoc tukey’s test at a significant level of p<0.05. \nResults: Enamel bond strength was significantly better in etch-and-rinse mode than the self etch mode for both Single Bond Universal (gp 2 & 3; p=0.017) and Tetric N-Bond Universal adhesives (gp 4 & 5; p=0.046) respectively. \nConclusion: Phosphoric acid etching of enamel prior to the application of a mild universal adhesive is an advisable strategy for optimizing bonding.","PeriodicalId":76664,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American College of Dentists","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American College of Dentists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2021.09.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different etching modes on the bonding efficacy of two universal adhesives to enamel. Materials and method: The study was performed in fifty five extracted human molar teeth. For shear bond strength testing, flat buccal surfaces were prepared. Teeth were randomly divided into five experimental groups according to two universal adhesives Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, U.S.A) and Tetric N-Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) used in different etching modes i.e etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode and one control group of etch & rinse adhesive (Adper Single bond-2). Teeth were mounted in self-cure acrylic resin and composite restorations were placed in all the samples after application of adhesives according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ten samples from each group were subjected to shear bond strength evaluation. Additionally one sample per group was subjected to scanning electron microscopic analysis for observing resin-enamel interfacial adaptation. Statistical analysis: Data collected was subjected to statistical analysis using one –way ANOVA and post-hoc tukey’s test at a significant level of p<0.05. Results: Enamel bond strength was significantly better in etch-and-rinse mode than the self etch mode for both Single Bond Universal (gp 2 & 3; p=0.017) and Tetric N-Bond Universal adhesives (gp 4 & 5; p=0.046) respectively. Conclusion: Phosphoric acid etching of enamel prior to the application of a mild universal adhesive is an advisable strategy for optimizing bonding.
不同蚀刻方式对通用胶粘剂与珐琅剪切结合强度的影响
目的:评价不同蚀刻方式对两种通用胶粘剂对牙釉质粘接效果的影响。材料与方法:以55颗拔除的人磨牙为研究对象。为了进行剪切粘结强度测试,我们制作了平坦的口腔表面。根据两种通用粘合剂Single Bond universal (3M ESPE, usa)和Tetric N-Bond universal (IvoclarVivadent)在不同蚀刻模式(蚀刻冲洗和自蚀刻模式)下的使用情况,将牙齿随机分为5个实验组和一个蚀刻冲洗粘合剂(Adper Single Bond -2)对照组。牙齿安装在自固化丙烯酸树脂中,根据制造商的说明在应用粘合剂后将复合修复体放置在所有样品中。每组取10个样品进行剪切粘结强度评价。每组取1个样品进行扫描电镜分析,观察树脂-牙釉质界面的适应情况。统计分析:收集的资料采用单因素方差分析(one -way ANOVA)和事后检验(post-hoc tukey’s)进行统计分析,p<0.05为显著水平。结果:单键通用型(gp 2 & 3;p=0.017)和Tetric N-Bond通用胶粘剂(gp 4 & 5;分别p = 0.046)。结论:在应用温和的通用粘接剂前进行磷酸腐蚀是优化牙釉质粘接的可取策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信