The Demand for Beef in Indonesia: Implications for Australian Agribusiness

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
H. Doran, C. O'Donnell, G. Griffith, H. Chang, M. Hutasuhut
{"title":"The Demand for Beef in Indonesia: Implications for Australian Agribusiness","authors":"H. Doran, C. O'Donnell, G. Griffith, H. Chang, M. Hutasuhut","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.12915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meat consumption and socio-demographic data from the 1990, 1993 and 1996 SUSENAS Household Food Expenditure and Consumption Surveys were employed to estimate the demand for meats in Indonesia. The focus was on the Provinces of DKI Jakarta and West Java where about one-fourth of the Indonesian population reside. Statistical and econometric procedures were used to aggregate the 16 meat types recorded in the SUSENAS into four Meat Groups. They were then used to estimate the Linear Approximation of the Almost Ideal Demand System (LA/AIDS) model, taking into account zero observations and the restrictions on budget shares. The demand for Meat Group 1 (with the dominant meat, beef) is income-inelastic, whereas for Meat Group 2 (with the dominant meat, commercial and native chicken) it is income-elastic. These two groups comprise nearly 95 per cent of all meat purchases. The estimated own-price elasticity of the beef group is -0.92, while that for the chicken group is -1.09. The cross-price elasticities indicate that all the meat groups are substitute goods, as expected. The results suggest that the current focus of the Indonesian government on strengthening the domestic poultry industry is well placed, as the demand for chicken is likely to respond more quickly to income growth than the demand for beef. Further, consumers seem more likely to adapt their chicken consumption patterns to price changes than they do for beef. However, these differences are relatively minor and there is still a major opportunity for Australian agribusiness firms in the cattle and beef sectors to take advantage of the projected rapid growth in Indonesian beef demand.","PeriodicalId":41561,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.12915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Meat consumption and socio-demographic data from the 1990, 1993 and 1996 SUSENAS Household Food Expenditure and Consumption Surveys were employed to estimate the demand for meats in Indonesia. The focus was on the Provinces of DKI Jakarta and West Java where about one-fourth of the Indonesian population reside. Statistical and econometric procedures were used to aggregate the 16 meat types recorded in the SUSENAS into four Meat Groups. They were then used to estimate the Linear Approximation of the Almost Ideal Demand System (LA/AIDS) model, taking into account zero observations and the restrictions on budget shares. The demand for Meat Group 1 (with the dominant meat, beef) is income-inelastic, whereas for Meat Group 2 (with the dominant meat, commercial and native chicken) it is income-elastic. These two groups comprise nearly 95 per cent of all meat purchases. The estimated own-price elasticity of the beef group is -0.92, while that for the chicken group is -1.09. The cross-price elasticities indicate that all the meat groups are substitute goods, as expected. The results suggest that the current focus of the Indonesian government on strengthening the domestic poultry industry is well placed, as the demand for chicken is likely to respond more quickly to income growth than the demand for beef. Further, consumers seem more likely to adapt their chicken consumption patterns to price changes than they do for beef. However, these differences are relatively minor and there is still a major opportunity for Australian agribusiness firms in the cattle and beef sectors to take advantage of the projected rapid growth in Indonesian beef demand.
印度尼西亚对牛肉的需求:对澳大利亚农业综合企业的启示
利用1990年、1993年和1996年SUSENAS家庭粮食支出和消费调查的肉类消费和社会人口数据来估计印度尼西亚对肉类的需求。重点放在约占印度尼西亚人口四分之一的雅加达和西爪哇省。使用统计和计量经济学程序将SUSENAS中记录的16种肉类类型汇总为四个肉类组。然后,它们被用来估计几乎理想需求系统(LA/AIDS)模型的线性逼近,考虑到零观测值和预算份额的限制。对第一类肉类(主要肉类是牛肉)的需求是非收入弹性的,而对第二类肉类(主要肉类是商品和土鸡)的需求是收入弹性的。这两个群体占所有肉类购买量的近95%。估计牛肉组的自有价格弹性为-0.92,而鸡肉组的自有价格弹性为-1.09。交叉价格弹性表明,所有肉类都是替代商品,正如预期的那样。结果表明,印尼政府目前将重点放在加强国内家禽业上是正确的,因为对鸡肉的需求可能比对牛肉的需求对收入增长的反应更快。此外,与牛肉相比,消费者似乎更有可能根据价格变化调整鸡肉的消费模式。然而,这些差异相对较小,澳大利亚在牛和牛肉行业的农业综合企业仍然有很大的机会利用预计印度尼西亚牛肉需求的快速增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Agribusiness Review
Australasian Agribusiness Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信