Tests of life or life of tests?: similarities and differences in parents’ and teachers’ prioritisation of character, academic attainment, the virtues and moral theories

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
T. Harrison, Katy Dineen, Francisco Moller
{"title":"Tests of life or life of tests?: similarities and differences in parents’ and teachers’ prioritisation of character, academic attainment, the virtues and moral theories","authors":"T. Harrison, Katy Dineen, Francisco Moller","doi":"10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although the area of parental involvement in education is well researched, much less is known about how parents and teachers might work together to cultivate desirable character virtues in their children/pupils. This article considers three potential barriers to parents/teachers forming such partnerships: i) differing views on the importance of character compared to academic attainment; ii) their prioritisation of moral, performance, civic and intellectual virtues; and iii) their prioritisation of different moral theories in ethical decision making. The article describes the findings from a quantitative study conducted with 376 parents and 137 teachers. The study found that both parents and teachers prioritise character over academic attainment but perceive the opposite to be true of their counterpart. Further, both parents and teachers rank moral virtues, such as honesty, as the most important, followed by performance virtues, such as resilience. The findings are significant as they illuminate a possible gap between parents and teachers in England, which, if addressed, will ensure children and young people are more likely to develop character qualities that contribute to individual and societal flourishing. Given that several countries are (re)introducing character education into the curriculum, the results of the study also have international significance.","PeriodicalId":45928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"137 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.1920233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the area of parental involvement in education is well researched, much less is known about how parents and teachers might work together to cultivate desirable character virtues in their children/pupils. This article considers three potential barriers to parents/teachers forming such partnerships: i) differing views on the importance of character compared to academic attainment; ii) their prioritisation of moral, performance, civic and intellectual virtues; and iii) their prioritisation of different moral theories in ethical decision making. The article describes the findings from a quantitative study conducted with 376 parents and 137 teachers. The study found that both parents and teachers prioritise character over academic attainment but perceive the opposite to be true of their counterpart. Further, both parents and teachers rank moral virtues, such as honesty, as the most important, followed by performance virtues, such as resilience. The findings are significant as they illuminate a possible gap between parents and teachers in England, which, if addressed, will ensure children and young people are more likely to develop character qualities that contribute to individual and societal flourishing. Given that several countries are (re)introducing character education into the curriculum, the results of the study also have international significance.
人生考验还是人生考验?:家长和老师对性格、学业成就、美德和道德理论的重视程度的异同
虽然父母参与教育这一领域已经得到了充分的研究,但对于父母和教师如何共同努力培养孩子/学生理想的品格美德,我们所知甚少。本文考虑了阻碍家长/老师建立这种伙伴关系的三个潜在障碍:1)与学习成绩相比,对性格重要性的不同看法;Ii)道德、表现、公民和智力美德的优先次序;第三,他们在伦理决策中优先考虑不同的道德理论。这篇文章描述了对376名家长和137名教师进行定量研究的结果。研究发现,父母和老师都认为孩子的性格比学习成绩更重要,但他们的父母和老师却认为孩子的性格比学习成绩更重要。此外,家长和老师都认为道德美德,如诚实,是最重要的,其次是表现美德,如适应能力。这些发现意义重大,因为它们揭示了英国家长和老师之间可能存在的差距,如果解决了这一问题,将确保儿童和年轻人更有可能培养有助于个人和社会繁荣的性格品质。鉴于一些国家正在(重新)将品格教育引入课程,研究结果也具有国际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信