The measure : Mk 4,24cd and Q 6,38c; 12,31b A note on its independence from Q

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
T. A. Friedrichsen
{"title":"The measure : Mk 4,24cd and Q 6,38c; 12,31b A note on its independence from Q","authors":"T. A. Friedrichsen","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"35 1","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.
测量值:Mk 4,24cd, Q 6,38c;12、31b关于其独立于Q的注释
本文首先概述了h.t. Fleddermann的建议(Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, pp. 85-87),即Mk 4,24cd中的Measure说法是Mark对Q 6,38c和12,31b的修订。为了完整起见,本笔记花了一些时间回顾弗莱德曼对q文本的重建。在那之后,注释批评他的方法不足以建立马可对Q的依赖,因为他的测量说(这个注释遵循作者对其他两个说法的类似处理:马可福音4,21和q11,33,在ETL 79 [2003] 423-430;Mk 4,22和Q 12,2,在ETL 80[2004] 439-444)。注释显示,弗莱德曼的建议要求马可把这两个Q节经文从它们自己的逻辑上下文中拿出来,把它们很不舒服地联系起来,并忽略了Q节讲道中的其他经文(本质上是6,20-49),这些经文可能会更好地服务于马可使用度量说来指门徒听到这个词的质量。该笔记的结论是,似乎更有可能的是,马克知道广为流传的Measure公理是一个独立的说法,他在这里使用它来达到自己的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信