Oxygen Therapy: When Is Too Much Too Much?

S. Shaefi, D. Talmor, B. Subramaniam
{"title":"Oxygen Therapy: When Is Too Much Too Much?","authors":"S. Shaefi, D. Talmor, B. Subramaniam","doi":"10.1097/SA.0000000000000292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H istorically, extreme care has been taken to avoid periods of hypoxemia with low blood oxygen levels in patients during anesthesia. This is particularly the case during surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), as hypoxemia is known to be potentially harmful. However, because hyperoxemia (excess oxygen in the blood) was believed to be relatively harmless, little effort went into avoiding this condition. Recent clinical data seem to suggest otherwise. The potentially dangerous effects of hyperoxemia include the extension of infarct size status post myocardial infarction, adverse neurologic outcomes, and higher mortality rates in patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia following return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest. As data regarding the detrimental effects of hyperoxemia have appeared, there has been a renewed interest in the potential role it may play in ischemia-reperfusion injury, reactive oxygen species production, and inflammation. In this issue ofAnesthesiology, McGuinness et al, in their article “A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase IIB Trial of Avoidance of Hyperoxemia During Cardiopulmonary Bypass,” investigate the avoidance of hyperoxemia during CPB and the possibility of reducing postoperative acute kidney injury. They","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0000000000000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

H istorically, extreme care has been taken to avoid periods of hypoxemia with low blood oxygen levels in patients during anesthesia. This is particularly the case during surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), as hypoxemia is known to be potentially harmful. However, because hyperoxemia (excess oxygen in the blood) was believed to be relatively harmless, little effort went into avoiding this condition. Recent clinical data seem to suggest otherwise. The potentially dangerous effects of hyperoxemia include the extension of infarct size status post myocardial infarction, adverse neurologic outcomes, and higher mortality rates in patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia following return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest. As data regarding the detrimental effects of hyperoxemia have appeared, there has been a renewed interest in the potential role it may play in ischemia-reperfusion injury, reactive oxygen species production, and inflammation. In this issue ofAnesthesiology, McGuinness et al, in their article “A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase IIB Trial of Avoidance of Hyperoxemia During Cardiopulmonary Bypass,” investigate the avoidance of hyperoxemia during CPB and the possibility of reducing postoperative acute kidney injury. They
氧疗:什么时候过量才算过量?
从历史上看,在麻醉过程中,为了避免患者出现低氧血症和低血氧水平,必须采取极端的措施。在涉及体外循环(CPB)的手术中尤其如此,因为低氧血症已知是潜在有害的。然而,由于高氧血症(血液中过量的氧气)被认为是相对无害的,人们很少努力避免这种情况。最近的临床数据似乎表明情况并非如此。高氧血症的潜在危险影响包括心肌梗死后梗死面积的扩大、不良的神经系统预后以及心脏骤停后自然循环恢复后接受治疗性低温治疗的患者的更高死亡率。随着有关高氧血症有害影响的数据的出现,人们对其在缺血再灌注损伤、活性氧产生和炎症中可能发挥的潜在作用重新产生了兴趣。在本期《麻醉学》杂志上,McGuinness等人发表了一篇题为《多中心、随机、对照IIB期体外循环避免高氧血症试验》的文章,探讨了体外循环期间避免高氧血症和减少术后急性肾损伤的可能性。他们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信