014 In-vivo determination of UVA sunscreen efficacy using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

D. Moyal, A. Chardon
{"title":"014 In-vivo determination of UVA sunscreen efficacy using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy","authors":"D. Moyal, A. Chardon","doi":"10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_14.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of in vitro and in vivo methods have been proposed to evaluate the UVA efficacy of sunscreens. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a recent approach that allows measuring sunscreen protectiveness in the UVA portion of the spectrum. FDA representatives have shown a marked interest for the development of this alternative method. The absorption spectrum of the product is obtained by measuring the change in skin reflection due to the product. From this absorption spectrum the UVA efficacy of a sunscreen product can then be calculated for an appropriate UV source and a given skin response action spectrum. One major advantage of this test method is that the UVA protection is determined directly on human skin, thus accounting for sunscreen/skin surface and emulsion interactions encountered in vivo, but not in vitro. Both DRS and in vivo persistent pigment darkening (PPD) method were used to compare the UVA efficacy of various UVA sunscreens (such as oxybenzone, avobenzone, ecamsule and zinc oxide at different concentrations) and of marketed products. A significant correlation was found between DRS and PPD results only for photostable products. To get a correlation with PPD results with photo-unstable products, a pre-exposure of the products applied on skin was found necessary before performing the DRS measurements. The DRS method allows evaluating both the UVA absorption spectrum of the products and their broadness of absorption and can thus be considered as a powerful tool for the in-vivo evaluation of sunscreen UVA protective efficacy.","PeriodicalId":20104,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"106-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_14.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of in vitro and in vivo methods have been proposed to evaluate the UVA efficacy of sunscreens. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a recent approach that allows measuring sunscreen protectiveness in the UVA portion of the spectrum. FDA representatives have shown a marked interest for the development of this alternative method. The absorption spectrum of the product is obtained by measuring the change in skin reflection due to the product. From this absorption spectrum the UVA efficacy of a sunscreen product can then be calculated for an appropriate UV source and a given skin response action spectrum. One major advantage of this test method is that the UVA protection is determined directly on human skin, thus accounting for sunscreen/skin surface and emulsion interactions encountered in vivo, but not in vitro. Both DRS and in vivo persistent pigment darkening (PPD) method were used to compare the UVA efficacy of various UVA sunscreens (such as oxybenzone, avobenzone, ecamsule and zinc oxide at different concentrations) and of marketed products. A significant correlation was found between DRS and PPD results only for photostable products. To get a correlation with PPD results with photo-unstable products, a pre-exposure of the products applied on skin was found necessary before performing the DRS measurements. The DRS method allows evaluating both the UVA absorption spectrum of the products and their broadness of absorption and can thus be considered as a powerful tool for the in-vivo evaluation of sunscreen UVA protective efficacy.
014利用漫反射光谱法在体内测定UVA防晒功效
已经提出了多种体外和体内方法来评估防晒霜的UVA功效。漫反射光谱(DRS)是一种最新的方法,可以测量防晒霜在UVA光谱部分的保护作用。FDA代表对这种替代方法的发展表现出了明显的兴趣。产品的吸收光谱是通过测量由于产品引起的皮肤反射的变化而得到的。根据这一吸收光谱,防晒霜产品的UVA功效可以根据适当的紫外线源和给定的皮肤反应作用谱计算出来。这种测试方法的一个主要优点是,UVA的防护是直接在人体皮肤上确定的,因此考虑了体内遇到的防晒霜/皮肤表面和乳液的相互作用,而不是在体外。采用DRS法和体内持续色素变暗法(PPD)比较了不同浓度的UVA防晒霜(如氧苯酮、阿伏苯酮、艾康胶囊和氧化锌)和市售产品的UVA功效。仅在光稳定产品中,DRS和PPD结果之间存在显著相关性。为了获得与光不稳定产品的PPD结果的相关性,在进行DRS测量之前,必须对应用在皮肤上的产品进行预曝光。DRS方法既可以评估产品的UVA吸收光谱,也可以评估产品的吸收广度,因此可以被认为是体内评估防晒霜UVA防护效果的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信