THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT’S LEGITIMATION TOWARD OMNIBUS LAW ON JOB CREATION: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS STUDY

R. Ananda, Nurmainiati
{"title":"THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT’S LEGITIMATION TOWARD OMNIBUS LAW ON JOB CREATION: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS STUDY","authors":"R. Ananda, Nurmainiati","doi":"10.46244/geej.v9i2.1898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Omnibus law on Job Creation passed in 2021 by the Indonesian Government has sparked a nationwide protests from many elements of societies. In this case, with its positive belief in the law, the government has to legitimize it so that it obtains approval from the society. This study seeks to answer the legitimation strategies employed by the government to convice the societies regarding the positive sides of this law implementation. To attain its objective, the current study used qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis as its method and Leeuwen’s framework on legitimation strategies as its analytical toolkit. The data was obtained from five giant online newspapers, namely The Jakarta Post, Serambi Indonesia, Kompas, CNN, and Republika from which 14 articles related to UU Cipker were extracted by means of Google search engine. The result of data analysis reveals that the government employed the moral evaluation strategy, rationalization strategy, and authorization strategy. Out of the three strategies, moral evaluation which is a legitimation built by referring to various moral values, was employed dominantly. Finally, this study suggests the society to critically listen to, read, and understand the government’s language. This study can also be used as a reference by English teachers to legitimize each material presented to motivate their students to be life-long learners by telling them why they should learn those presented materials.","PeriodicalId":53044,"journal":{"name":"Getsempena English Education Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getsempena English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v9i2.1898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Omnibus law on Job Creation passed in 2021 by the Indonesian Government has sparked a nationwide protests from many elements of societies. In this case, with its positive belief in the law, the government has to legitimize it so that it obtains approval from the society. This study seeks to answer the legitimation strategies employed by the government to convice the societies regarding the positive sides of this law implementation. To attain its objective, the current study used qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis as its method and Leeuwen’s framework on legitimation strategies as its analytical toolkit. The data was obtained from five giant online newspapers, namely The Jakarta Post, Serambi Indonesia, Kompas, CNN, and Republika from which 14 articles related to UU Cipker were extracted by means of Google search engine. The result of data analysis reveals that the government employed the moral evaluation strategy, rationalization strategy, and authorization strategy. Out of the three strategies, moral evaluation which is a legitimation built by referring to various moral values, was employed dominantly. Finally, this study suggests the society to critically listen to, read, and understand the government’s language. This study can also be used as a reference by English teachers to legitimize each material presented to motivate their students to be life-long learners by telling them why they should learn those presented materials.
印尼政府对创造就业综合法的正当性:批判话语分析研究
印度尼西亚政府于2021年通过的《创造就业综合法》引发了来自社会各阶层的全国性抗议。在这种情况下,怀着对法律的积极信念,政府必须使其合法化,从而获得社会的认可。本研究旨在回答政府采用的合法化策略,以使社会相信这项法律实施的积极方面。为了实现这一目标,本研究采用了定性研究方法,以批判性话语分析为方法,以Leeuwen的合法化策略框架为分析工具。数据来源于《雅加达邮报》、《印尼新闻报》、《Kompas》、CNN、《共和报》等5家大型网络报纸,通过谷歌搜索引擎提取了与UU Cipker相关的14篇文章。数据分析结果显示,政府采取了道德评价策略、合理化策略和授权策略。在这三种策略中,道德评价是一种通过参考各种道德价值观而建立起来的正当性,它的使用占主导地位。最后,本研究建议社会批判性地倾听、阅读和理解政府的语言。本研究也可以作为英语教师的参考,通过告诉学生为什么要学习这些材料,使所呈现的材料合法化,从而激励学生成为终身学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信