The connenction between global innovation index and economic well-being indexes

Szlobodan Vukoszavlyev
{"title":"The connenction between global innovation index and economic well-being indexes","authors":"Szlobodan Vukoszavlyev","doi":"10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the connection of innovation in 126 countries by different well-being indicators and whether there are differences among geographical regions with respect to innovation index score. We approach and define innovation based on Global Innovation Index (GII). The following well-being indicators were emphasized in the research: GDP per capita measured at purchasing power parity, unemployment rate, life expectancy, crude mortality rate, human development index (HDI). Innovation index score was downloaded from the joint publication of 2018 of Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, HDI from the website of the UN while we obtained other well-being indicators from the database of the World Bank. Non-parametric hypothesis testing, post-hoc tests and linear regression were used in the study.We concluded that there are differences among regions/continents based on GII. It is scarcely surprising that North America is the best performer followed by Europe (with significant differences among countries). Central and South Asia scored the next places with high standard deviation. The following regions with significant backwardness include North Africa, West Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean Area, Central and South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Regions lagging behind have lower standard deviation, that is, they are more homogeneous therefore there are no significant differences among countries in the particular region.In the regression modelling of the Global Innovation Index, it was concluded that GDP per capita, life expectancy and human development index are significant explanatory indicators. In the multivariable regression analysis, HDI remained the only explanatory variable in the final model. It is due to the fact that there was significant multicollinearity among the explanatory variables and the HDI aggregates several non-economic indicators like GII. \nJEL Classification: B41, I31, O31, Q55","PeriodicalId":32569,"journal":{"name":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We study the connection of innovation in 126 countries by different well-being indicators and whether there are differences among geographical regions with respect to innovation index score. We approach and define innovation based on Global Innovation Index (GII). The following well-being indicators were emphasized in the research: GDP per capita measured at purchasing power parity, unemployment rate, life expectancy, crude mortality rate, human development index (HDI). Innovation index score was downloaded from the joint publication of 2018 of Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, HDI from the website of the UN while we obtained other well-being indicators from the database of the World Bank. Non-parametric hypothesis testing, post-hoc tests and linear regression were used in the study.We concluded that there are differences among regions/continents based on GII. It is scarcely surprising that North America is the best performer followed by Europe (with significant differences among countries). Central and South Asia scored the next places with high standard deviation. The following regions with significant backwardness include North Africa, West Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean Area, Central and South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Regions lagging behind have lower standard deviation, that is, they are more homogeneous therefore there are no significant differences among countries in the particular region.In the regression modelling of the Global Innovation Index, it was concluded that GDP per capita, life expectancy and human development index are significant explanatory indicators. In the multivariable regression analysis, HDI remained the only explanatory variable in the final model. It is due to the fact that there was significant multicollinearity among the explanatory variables and the HDI aggregates several non-economic indicators like GII. JEL Classification: B41, I31, O31, Q55
全球创新指数与经济福祉指数的关系
我们通过不同的幸福指数研究了126个国家的创新之间的联系,以及创新指数得分在地理区域之间是否存在差异。我们根据全球创新指数(GII)来衡量和定义创新。研究强调了下列福利指标:按购买力平价计算的人均国内总产值、失业率、预期寿命、粗死亡率、人类发展指数。创新指数得分从康奈尔大学、欧洲工商管理学院和世界知识产权组织联合发布的2018年报告中下载,人类发展指数从联合国网站下载,其他福祉指标从世界银行数据库获取。研究采用非参数假设检验、事后检验和线性回归。我们的结论是,基于GII的地区/大陆之间存在差异。毫不奇怪,北美是表现最好的,其次是欧洲(各国之间存在显著差异)。中亚和南亚紧随其后,标准差较高。严重落后的地区包括北非、西亚、拉丁美洲、加勒比地区、中亚和南亚以及撒哈拉以南非洲。落后地区的标准差更低,即同质性更强,因此在特定区域内国家之间没有显著差异。在全球创新指数的回归模型中,得出人均GDP、预期寿命和人类发展指数是显著的解释性指标。在多变量回归分析中,HDI仍然是最终模型中唯一的解释变量。这是因为解释变量之间存在显著的多重共线性,而且HDI集合了GII等多个非经济指标。JEL分类:B41, I31, O31, Q55
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信