Identifying Stakeholder Perspectives on Data Industry Regulation in South Korea

Q3 Social Sciences

Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1633/10.1633/JISTAP.2021.9.3.2

Youhyun Lee, I. Jung

{"title":"Identifying Stakeholder Perspectives on Data Industry Regulation in South Korea","authors":"Youhyun Lee, I. Jung","doi":"10.1633/10.1633/JISTAP.2021.9.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data innovation is at the core of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. While the catastrophic COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the societal shift toward a data-driven society, the direction of overall data regulation remains unclear and data policy experts have yet to reach a consensus. This study identifies and examines the ideal regulator models of data-policy experts and suggests an appropriate method for developing policy in the data economy. To identify different typologies of data regulation, this study used Q methodology with 42 data policy experts, including public officers, researchers, entrepreneurs, and professors, and additional focus group interviews (FGIs) with six data policy experts. Using a Q survey, this study discerns four types of data policy regulators: proactive activists, neutral conservatives, pro-protection idealists, and pro-protection pragmatists. Based on the results of the analysis and FGIs, this study suggests three practical policy implications for framing a nation’s data policy. It also discusses possibilities for exploring diverse methods of data industry regulation, underscoring the value of identifying regulatory issues in the data industry from a social science perspective. © 2021. Youhyun Lee, Il-Young Jung","PeriodicalId":37582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1633/10.1633/JISTAP.2021.9.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Data innovation is at the core of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. While the catastrophic COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the societal shift toward a data-driven society, the direction of overall data regulation remains unclear and data policy experts have yet to reach a consensus. This study identifies and examines the ideal regulator models of data-policy experts and suggests an appropriate method for developing policy in the data economy. To identify different typologies of data regulation, this study used Q methodology with 42 data policy experts, including public officers, researchers, entrepreneurs, and professors, and additional focus group interviews (FGIs) with six data policy experts. Using a Q survey, this study discerns four types of data policy regulators: proactive activists, neutral conservatives, pro-protection idealists, and pro-protection pragmatists. Based on the results of the analysis and FGIs, this study suggests three practical policy implications for framing a nation’s data policy. It also discusses possibilities for exploring diverse methods of data industry regulation, underscoring the value of identifying regulatory issues in the data industry from a social science perspective. © 2021. Youhyun Lee, Il-Young Jung

查看原文本刊更多论文

识别利益相关者对韩国数据产业监管的看法

数据创新是第四次工业革命的核心。虽然灾难性的COVID-19大流行加速了社会向数据驱动型社会的转变，但整体数据监管的方向仍不明朗，数据政策专家尚未达成共识。本研究确定并检验了数据政策专家的理想监管模型，并为数据经济中的政策制定提出了合适的方法。为了确定不同类型的数据监管，本研究使用Q方法与42位数据政策专家，包括政府官员，研究人员，企业家

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice (JISTaP) is an international journal that aims at publishing original studies, review papers and brief communications on information science theory and practice. The journal provides an international forum for practical as well as theoretical research in the interdisciplinary areas of information science, such as information processing and management, knowledge organization, scholarly communication and bibliometrics. To foster scholarly communication among researchers and practitioners of library and information science around the globe, JISTaP offers a no-fee open access publishing venue where a team of dedicated editors, reviewers and staff members volunteer their services to ensure rapid dissemination and communication of scholarly works that make significant contributions. In a modern society, where information production and consumption grow at an astronomical rate, the science of information management, organization, and analysis is invaluable in effective utilization of information. The key objective of the journal is to foster research that can contribute to advancements and innovations in the theory and practice of information and library science so as to promote timely application of the findings from scientific investigations to everyday life. Recognizing the importance of the global perspective with understanding of region-specific issues, JISTaP encourages submissions of manuscripts that discuss global implications of regional findings as well as regional implications of global findings.