DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INFANCY

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susan Mcdonough, H. Fitzgerald
{"title":"DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INFANCY","authors":"Susan Mcdonough, H. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1002/IMHJ.10051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Infant Mental Health Journal presents the plenary addresses from WAIMH’s 7th World Congress in Montreal, Canada (2000). As we noted in the program booklet for that congress, the field of infant mental health coalesces around three common assumptions: infant behavior cannot be viewed separately from relationships with others; infants’ most important relationships are with their primary caregivers; and infant caregivers have relationships with others in their social contexts. These assumptions rest on such historical reminders that infants are born into a social world (Rheingold, 1968), which consists of reciprocal relationships (Bell, 1968), (especially) with primary caregivers (Winnicott, 1964), who may or may not have unresolved issues that construct barriers to the development of secure social-emotional relationships (Fraiberg, Adelson, & Shapiro, 1975). All of these characterizations provide a basis for understanding that infant mental health is grounded in the reciprocal interactions that infants have with others within the extraordinarily diverse contexts in which infants live and negotiate the world. Infants, caregivers, extended family members, and the broader social and cultural networks in which these families are embedded, provide the contexts that influence social and emotional development and generate issues relevant to infant mental health (Fitzgerald & Barton, 2000). If there is any common theme cutting across all of the contexts within which human infants live and thrive or atrophy and die, it is diversity. The theme of the 7th World Congress, “Diversity: Challenges and Opportunities in Infancy,” captured the Program Committee’s desire to examine contemporary knowledge about the infant in multiple contexts. The congress subthemes were selected to reflect trends in research, clinical practice, and social policy, or to draw attention to issues that should enter into the domain of topics that define modern “trends.” The subthemes and plenary speakers whose works are published in this issue of the Infant Mental Health Journal were “Brain–Behavior Interface” (Megan Gunnar, United States), “De-","PeriodicalId":83356,"journal":{"name":"Tradition (Rabbinical Council of America)","volume":"9 1","pages":"193-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tradition (Rabbinical Council of America)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/IMHJ.10051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This special issue of the Infant Mental Health Journal presents the plenary addresses from WAIMH’s 7th World Congress in Montreal, Canada (2000). As we noted in the program booklet for that congress, the field of infant mental health coalesces around three common assumptions: infant behavior cannot be viewed separately from relationships with others; infants’ most important relationships are with their primary caregivers; and infant caregivers have relationships with others in their social contexts. These assumptions rest on such historical reminders that infants are born into a social world (Rheingold, 1968), which consists of reciprocal relationships (Bell, 1968), (especially) with primary caregivers (Winnicott, 1964), who may or may not have unresolved issues that construct barriers to the development of secure social-emotional relationships (Fraiberg, Adelson, & Shapiro, 1975). All of these characterizations provide a basis for understanding that infant mental health is grounded in the reciprocal interactions that infants have with others within the extraordinarily diverse contexts in which infants live and negotiate the world. Infants, caregivers, extended family members, and the broader social and cultural networks in which these families are embedded, provide the contexts that influence social and emotional development and generate issues relevant to infant mental health (Fitzgerald & Barton, 2000). If there is any common theme cutting across all of the contexts within which human infants live and thrive or atrophy and die, it is diversity. The theme of the 7th World Congress, “Diversity: Challenges and Opportunities in Infancy,” captured the Program Committee’s desire to examine contemporary knowledge about the infant in multiple contexts. The congress subthemes were selected to reflect trends in research, clinical practice, and social policy, or to draw attention to issues that should enter into the domain of topics that define modern “trends.” The subthemes and plenary speakers whose works are published in this issue of the Infant Mental Health Journal were “Brain–Behavior Interface” (Megan Gunnar, United States), “De-
多样性:婴儿期的挑战和机遇
本期《婴儿心理健康杂志》特刊介绍了2000年在加拿大蒙特利尔举行的第七届婴儿心理健康协会世界大会的全体发言。正如我们在那次大会的项目手册中所指出的,婴儿心理健康领域围绕着三个共同的假设:婴儿的行为不能与与他人的关系分开看待;婴儿最重要的关系是与其主要照顾者之间的关系;照顾婴儿的人在他们的社会环境中与他人有关系。这些假设基于这样的历史提醒,即婴儿出生在一个社会世界(Rheingold, 1968),其中包括互惠关系(Bell, 1968),(特别是)与主要照顾者(Winnicott, 1964),他们可能有也可能没有解决的问题,这些问题构成了安全社会情感关系发展的障碍(Fraiberg, Adelson, & Shapiro, 1975)。所有这些特征都为理解婴儿心理健康是建立在婴儿与其他人在极其多样化的环境中生活和与世界交往的相互作用的基础上。婴儿、照顾者、大家庭成员以及这些家庭所嵌入的更广泛的社会和文化网络,提供了影响社会和情感发展的环境,并产生了与婴儿心理健康相关的问题(菲茨杰拉德和巴顿,2000)。如果有一个共同的主题贯穿人类婴儿生存、成长、萎缩和死亡的所有背景,那就是多样性。第七届世界大会的主题是“多样性:婴儿期的挑战和机遇”,反映了计划委员会希望在多种背景下研究当代关于婴儿的知识的愿望。大会的次主题是为了反映研究、临床实践和社会政策的趋势,或者是为了引起人们对应该进入定义现代“趋势”主题领域的问题的关注。其作品发表在本期《婴儿心理健康杂志》上的分主题和全体会议发言人是"脑-行为界面" (Megan Gunnar,美国)、" De-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信