Death and Burial in the Roman Age

John Pearce
{"title":"Death and Burial in the Roman Age","authors":"John Pearce","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence for death and burial in the Roman age extends across all materials surviving from Antiquity, literary texts, the remnants of memorials to the dead, inscriptions, images, and burials themselves, both the remains of the dead and the objects used in the rituals for burying them. This diversity of source material and the relevance of funerary evidence to so many aspects of ancient life continue to fragment scholarship. The allocation of epitaphs, architecture, images, artifacts, and the remains of the dead to separate disciplines has compounded their decontextualization from funerary ensembles. The subject area has also been divided by different approaches depending on the region and period concerned: the dominant interests in late Roman burials, for example, have been the investigation of Christian conversion or migration into the Roman world. However, some unifying trends can be observed. In recent decades attention has shifted to exploring the mass of burial evidence for what it reveals of Roman society, its social structures, demographic characteristics, and so on. This has been given extra impetus by the results of archaeological fieldwork, creating a sample of well-excavated burials and human skeletal remains which now rivals the numbers of inscribed memorials. The optimism of reading off social structures or demographic characteristics from funerary evidence has been replaced with an emphasis on exploring how groups and individuals negotiated their relationships to their communities through rituals and monuments. This essay presents Roman behavior in relation to death, bereavement, and commemoration, mainly using material evidence in its broadest sense. It is necessarily selective, giving examples of key syntheses and datasets and of developing approaches. In some cases (especially monuments) it gives some greater weighting to English language publications, especially where they provide gateways to non-Anglophone scholarship. After opening sections on general works on death and burial and on the Roman funeral and mourning, the essay discusses in turn monuments, funerary rituals as reconstructed from archaeological evidence, and late Roman burial practice, including its relationship to conversion to Christianity. It concludes with case studies where different forms of evidence, architectural, artistic, artifactual, osteological, etc. combine to produce a richer view of monuments and processes, in specific cultural and social contexts across the empire. Study of human remains from a demographic or paleopathological perspective is outside the scope of this essay, though some bibliographic pointers are given in the first section (Overviews of Death and Burial). Recent work on osteological and biomolecular characteristics of the skeleton is however noted where its integration with the evidence for rituals has significantly enriched the study of identities in death.","PeriodicalId":82164,"journal":{"name":"Nigeria and the classics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigeria and the classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence for death and burial in the Roman age extends across all materials surviving from Antiquity, literary texts, the remnants of memorials to the dead, inscriptions, images, and burials themselves, both the remains of the dead and the objects used in the rituals for burying them. This diversity of source material and the relevance of funerary evidence to so many aspects of ancient life continue to fragment scholarship. The allocation of epitaphs, architecture, images, artifacts, and the remains of the dead to separate disciplines has compounded their decontextualization from funerary ensembles. The subject area has also been divided by different approaches depending on the region and period concerned: the dominant interests in late Roman burials, for example, have been the investigation of Christian conversion or migration into the Roman world. However, some unifying trends can be observed. In recent decades attention has shifted to exploring the mass of burial evidence for what it reveals of Roman society, its social structures, demographic characteristics, and so on. This has been given extra impetus by the results of archaeological fieldwork, creating a sample of well-excavated burials and human skeletal remains which now rivals the numbers of inscribed memorials. The optimism of reading off social structures or demographic characteristics from funerary evidence has been replaced with an emphasis on exploring how groups and individuals negotiated their relationships to their communities through rituals and monuments. This essay presents Roman behavior in relation to death, bereavement, and commemoration, mainly using material evidence in its broadest sense. It is necessarily selective, giving examples of key syntheses and datasets and of developing approaches. In some cases (especially monuments) it gives some greater weighting to English language publications, especially where they provide gateways to non-Anglophone scholarship. After opening sections on general works on death and burial and on the Roman funeral and mourning, the essay discusses in turn monuments, funerary rituals as reconstructed from archaeological evidence, and late Roman burial practice, including its relationship to conversion to Christianity. It concludes with case studies where different forms of evidence, architectural, artistic, artifactual, osteological, etc. combine to produce a richer view of monuments and processes, in specific cultural and social contexts across the empire. Study of human remains from a demographic or paleopathological perspective is outside the scope of this essay, though some bibliographic pointers are given in the first section (Overviews of Death and Burial). Recent work on osteological and biomolecular characteristics of the skeleton is however noted where its integration with the evidence for rituals has significantly enriched the study of identities in death.
罗马时代的死亡与埋葬
罗马时代死亡和埋葬的证据涵盖了所有从古代幸存下来的材料,文学文本,死者纪念的残余物,铭文,图像和埋葬本身,死者遗体和埋葬仪式中使用的物品。来源材料的多样性以及丧葬证据与古代生活的许多方面的相关性继续使学术研究支离破碎。墓志铭、建筑、图像、文物和死者遗体的分配,使他们从丧葬合奏中脱离语境。根据所涉及的地区和时期,主题领域也被不同的方法所划分:例如,对罗马晚期墓葬的主要兴趣是对基督教皈依或移民到罗马世界的调查。然而,可以观察到一些统一的趋势。近几十年来,人们的注意力已经转移到探索大量的埋葬证据,以揭示罗马社会、社会结构、人口特征等。考古现场工作的结果为这一观点提供了额外的动力,这些工作创造了一个精心挖掘的墓葬和人类骨骼遗骸样本,现在可以与铭刻的纪念碑数量相媲美。从丧葬证据中解读社会结构或人口特征的乐观主义已经被强调探索群体和个人如何通过仪式和纪念碑与社区协商他们的关系所取代。这篇文章介绍了罗马人与死亡、丧亲之痛和纪念有关的行为,主要使用最广泛意义上的物证。它必须是选择性的,给出关键综合和数据集以及发展方法的例子。在某些情况下(尤其是纪念碑),它给予英语出版物更大的权重,特别是在它们提供非英语国家奖学金的门户时。在关于死亡和埋葬的一般作品以及罗马葬礼和哀悼的开篇部分之后,本文依次讨论了纪念碑,从考古证据重建的丧葬仪式,以及罗马晚期的丧葬习俗,包括其与皈依基督教的关系。它以案例研究结束,在这些案例研究中,不同形式的证据,建筑,艺术,人工制品,骨学等结合起来,在整个帝国的特定文化和社会背景下,产生了更丰富的纪念碑和过程视图。从人口统计学或古病理学的角度研究人类遗骸不在本文的范围之内,尽管在第一部分(死亡与埋葬概述)中给出了一些参考书目。然而,最近对骨骼的骨学和生物分子特征的研究表明,它与仪式证据的结合极大地丰富了对死亡身份的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信