Do the Test Smells Assertion Roulette and Eager Test Impact Students’ Troubleshooting and Debugging Capabilities?

Wajdi Aljedaani, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Anthony Peruma, S. Ludi
{"title":"Do the Test Smells Assertion Roulette and Eager Test Impact Students’ Troubleshooting and Debugging Capabilities?","authors":"Wajdi Aljedaani, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Anthony Peruma, S. Ludi","doi":"10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To ensure the quality of a software system, developers perform an activity known as unit testing, where they write code (known as test cases) that verifies the individual software units that make up the system. Like production code, test cases are subject to bad programming practices, known as test smells, that hurt maintenance activities. An essential part of most maintenance activities is program comprehension which involves developers reading the code to understand its behavior to fix issues or update features. In this study, we conduct a controlled experiment with 96 undergraduate computer science students to investigate the impact of two common types of test smells, namely Assertion Roulette and Eager Test, on a student’s ability to debug and troubleshoot test case failures. Our findings show that students take longer to correct errors in production code when smells are present in their associated test cases, especially Assertion Roulette. We envision our findings supporting academia in better equipping students with the knowledge and resources in writing and maintaining high-quality test cases. Our experimental materials are available online11https://wajdialjedaani.github.io/testsmellstd/","PeriodicalId":68155,"journal":{"name":"软件产业与工程","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"软件产业与工程","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To ensure the quality of a software system, developers perform an activity known as unit testing, where they write code (known as test cases) that verifies the individual software units that make up the system. Like production code, test cases are subject to bad programming practices, known as test smells, that hurt maintenance activities. An essential part of most maintenance activities is program comprehension which involves developers reading the code to understand its behavior to fix issues or update features. In this study, we conduct a controlled experiment with 96 undergraduate computer science students to investigate the impact of two common types of test smells, namely Assertion Roulette and Eager Test, on a student’s ability to debug and troubleshoot test case failures. Our findings show that students take longer to correct errors in production code when smells are present in their associated test cases, especially Assertion Roulette. We envision our findings supporting academia in better equipping students with the knowledge and resources in writing and maintaining high-quality test cases. Our experimental materials are available online11https://wajdialjedaani.github.io/testsmellstd/
测试气味断言轮盘赌和渴望测试是否影响学生的故障排除和调试能力?
为了确保软件系统的质量,开发人员执行一种称为单元测试的活动,他们在其中编写代码(称为测试用例)来验证组成系统的单个软件单元。与产品代码一样,测试用例也受制于不良的编程实践,即所谓的“测试气味”,这会损害维护活动。大多数维护活动的一个重要部分是程序理解,这涉及到开发人员阅读代码以理解其行为以修复问题或更新功能。在这项研究中,我们对96名计算机科学专业的本科生进行了一项对照实验,以调查两种常见的测试气味,即断言轮盘赌和渴望测试,对学生调试和排除测试用例失败的能力的影响。我们的发现表明,当气味出现在相关的测试用例中时,学生需要更长的时间来纠正产品代码中的错误,尤其是断言轮盘赌。我们设想我们的发现支持学术界更好地为学生提供编写和维护高质量测试用例的知识和资源。我们的实验材料可以在网上找到:11https://wajdialjedaani.github.io/testsmellstd/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
676
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信