Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph is not sufficient to confirm hip reduction after conservative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph alone is sufficient to confirm hip reduction after conservative treatment or whether MRI could be alternatively performed. A total of 133 children (145 hips) were enrolled. All children were examined by anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and MRI. Three experts interpreted anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and then verified these results on MRI. For patients with inconsistent results between anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and MRI, the continuity of Shenton’s line and Calve’s line was recorded, and the medial clear space of bilateral hips was measured for unilateral cases. There was complete agreement between the three experts in the interpretation of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 111 (76.55%) hips; there was disagreement in the remaining 34 hips, with two experts diagnosing satisfactory reduction in 13 hips and dislocation in 21 hips. Assuming that the judgment of two or more doctors on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs was taken as the final result, 17 hips (11.72%) were misjudged. There was no statistically significant difference between the actual in-position group and the actual dislocation group in terms of the continuity of Shenton’s line (P = 0.62) and Calve’s line (P = 0.10) and the medial clear space of bilateral hips (P = 0.08). In children less than 1 year of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated conservatively, the use of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs alone to judge hip reduction might result in misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. MRI could be alternatively used to detect hip reduction after conservative treatment, especially when the doctor was not familiar with ultrasound in the presence of plaster.