Testing hypotheses for the presence of tRNA genes in mycobacteriophage genomes

V. Delesalle, Natalie T Tanke, Albert C. Vill, G. Krukonis
{"title":"Testing hypotheses for the presence of tRNA genes in mycobacteriophage genomes","authors":"V. Delesalle, Natalie T Tanke, Albert C. Vill, G. Krukonis","doi":"10.1080/21597081.2016.1219441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The presence of tRNA genes in bacteriophages has been explained on the basis of codon usage (tRNA genes are retained in the phage genome if they correspond to codons more common in the phage than in its host) or amino acid usage (independent of codon, the amino acid corresponding to the retained tRNA gene is more common in the phage genome than in the bacterial host). The existence of a large database of sequenced mycobacteriophages, isolated on the common host Mycobacterium smegmatis, allows us to test the above hypotheses as well as explore other hypotheses for the presence of tRNA genes. Our analyses suggest that amino acid rather than codon usage better explains the presence of tRNA genes in mycobacteriophages. However, closely related phages that differ in the presence of tRNA genes in their genomes are capable of lysing the common bacterial host and do not differ in codon or amino acid usage. This suggests that the benefits of having tRNA genes may be associated with either growth in the host or the ability to infect more hosts (i.e., host range) rather than simply infecting a particular host.","PeriodicalId":8686,"journal":{"name":"Bacteriophage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bacteriophage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21597081.2016.1219441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

ABSTRACT The presence of tRNA genes in bacteriophages has been explained on the basis of codon usage (tRNA genes are retained in the phage genome if they correspond to codons more common in the phage than in its host) or amino acid usage (independent of codon, the amino acid corresponding to the retained tRNA gene is more common in the phage genome than in the bacterial host). The existence of a large database of sequenced mycobacteriophages, isolated on the common host Mycobacterium smegmatis, allows us to test the above hypotheses as well as explore other hypotheses for the presence of tRNA genes. Our analyses suggest that amino acid rather than codon usage better explains the presence of tRNA genes in mycobacteriophages. However, closely related phages that differ in the presence of tRNA genes in their genomes are capable of lysing the common bacterial host and do not differ in codon or amino acid usage. This suggests that the benefits of having tRNA genes may be associated with either growth in the host or the ability to infect more hosts (i.e., host range) rather than simply infecting a particular host.
验证分支噬菌体基因组中tRNA基因存在的假设
tRNA基因在噬菌体中的存在是基于密码子的使用(如果tRNA基因与噬菌体中比宿主中更常见的密码子相对应,则tRNA基因保留在噬菌体基因组中)或氨基酸的使用(与密码子无关,与保留的tRNA基因相对应的氨基酸在噬菌体基因组中比在细菌宿主中更常见)来解释的。从耻垢分枝杆菌的共同宿主上分离出的已测序的分枝噬菌体的大型数据库的存在,使我们能够检验上述假设,并探索tRNA基因存在的其他假设。我们的分析表明,氨基酸的使用比密码子的使用更能解释分枝噬菌体中tRNA基因的存在。然而,在其基因组中存在tRNA基因的密切相关的噬菌体能够裂解共同的细菌宿主,并且在密码子或氨基酸的使用上没有差异。这表明,携带tRNA基因的好处可能与宿主的生长或感染更多宿主(即宿主范围)的能力有关,而不是简单地感染特定宿主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信