Use of CTFFR and CTCA to Diagnose and Triage Patients of INOCA: A Retrospective Study

A. Kapoor, G. Mahajan, A. Kapur
{"title":"Use of CTFFR and CTCA to Diagnose and Triage Patients of INOCA: A Retrospective Study","authors":"A. Kapoor, G. Mahajan, A. Kapur","doi":"10.11648/J.CCR.20210502.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: INOCA (Ischemia in non- obstructive coronary arteries) has been recognized as a global health problem and poses a diagnostic challenge to establish the diagnosis which involves first ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease by the use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) or an invasive angiogram. Second step involves the use of intracoronary pressure and Doppler monitoring which is not only costly, time consuming and lacks easy availability. CTFFR has emerged as frontline tool in the non invasive evaluation of patients with stable chest pain. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the spectrum of findings of ischemia on CTCA and CT FFR in patients with stable chest pain to determine if this protocol can be used to identify patients with INOCA before they are subjected to invasive protocol. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients of stable chest pain with more than >1mm ST depression on resting EKG and or positive stress test who underwent CTCA along with CTFFR evaluation using a prescribed CT angiographic protocol. Post processing was done to reconstruct multiplanar angiographic views followed by CT FFR evaluation. All patients with no obstruction or stenosis less than 50% and with CT FFR of <0.80 were labeled as having INOCA. Subcategorisation of all INOCA patients was done based on Vessel tapering index (VTI), Plaque volume Index (PVI) into four subtypes- TypeI (vasospastic), Type II (site specific atherosclerotic), Type III (distal macrovascular dysfunction- DMD), Type IV (mixed). Results: Study showed 122 (34%) patients of stable chest pain had INOCA. Types I, III formed the largest group of patients 38% and 31% followed by the other two subtypes and showed significant differences in the VTI and PVI along with reduced FFR of <.80 in all these patients. Conclusion: Use of CTCA and CTFFR can be used as a first line tool to not only rule out obstructive coronary disease with ischemia but also to non invasively detect INOCA in patients with stable chest pain before subjecting these patients for further invasive protocols and can influence accurate management of such patients.","PeriodicalId":92185,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology research and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology research and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.CCR.20210502.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: INOCA (Ischemia in non- obstructive coronary arteries) has been recognized as a global health problem and poses a diagnostic challenge to establish the diagnosis which involves first ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease by the use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) or an invasive angiogram. Second step involves the use of intracoronary pressure and Doppler monitoring which is not only costly, time consuming and lacks easy availability. CTFFR has emerged as frontline tool in the non invasive evaluation of patients with stable chest pain. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the spectrum of findings of ischemia on CTCA and CT FFR in patients with stable chest pain to determine if this protocol can be used to identify patients with INOCA before they are subjected to invasive protocol. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients of stable chest pain with more than >1mm ST depression on resting EKG and or positive stress test who underwent CTCA along with CTFFR evaluation using a prescribed CT angiographic protocol. Post processing was done to reconstruct multiplanar angiographic views followed by CT FFR evaluation. All patients with no obstruction or stenosis less than 50% and with CT FFR of <0.80 were labeled as having INOCA. Subcategorisation of all INOCA patients was done based on Vessel tapering index (VTI), Plaque volume Index (PVI) into four subtypes- TypeI (vasospastic), Type II (site specific atherosclerotic), Type III (distal macrovascular dysfunction- DMD), Type IV (mixed). Results: Study showed 122 (34%) patients of stable chest pain had INOCA. Types I, III formed the largest group of patients 38% and 31% followed by the other two subtypes and showed significant differences in the VTI and PVI along with reduced FFR of <.80 in all these patients. Conclusion: Use of CTCA and CTFFR can be used as a first line tool to not only rule out obstructive coronary disease with ischemia but also to non invasively detect INOCA in patients with stable chest pain before subjecting these patients for further invasive protocols and can influence accurate management of such patients.
利用CTFFR和CTCA对INOCA患者的诊断和分类:一项回顾性研究
目的:INOCA(非阻塞性冠状动脉缺血)已被认为是一个全球性的健康问题,对建立诊断提出了挑战,这包括首先通过使用CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)或有创血管造影来排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病。第二步涉及使用冠状动脉内压和多普勒监测,这不仅昂贵,耗时且不易获得。CTFFR已成为稳定胸痛患者无创评估的前沿工具。本回顾性研究旨在评估稳定性胸痛患者的CTCA和CT FFR缺血谱,以确定该方案是否可用于在进行有创方案之前识别inova患者。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,对500例连续的稳定胸痛患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在静息心电图中ST位下降超过1mm,或应激试验呈阳性,并使用规定的CT血管造影方案进行了CTCA和CTFFR评估。后处理重建多平面血管图像,然后进行CT FFR评估。所有无梗阻或狭窄小于50%且CT FFR <0.80的患者均标记为INOCA。根据血管收缩指数(VTI)、斑块体积指数(PVI)对所有INOCA患者进行亚分类,分为四种亚型:Type pei(血管痉挛)、Type II(部位特异性动脉粥样硬化)、Type III(远端大血管功能障碍- DMD)、Type IV(混合型)。结果:122例(34%)稳健性胸痛患者有INOCA。I型和III型患者最多,分别占38%和31%,其次是其他两个亚型,VTI和PVI差异显著,FFR <。这些病人中有80人。结论:CTCA和CTFFR不仅可以作为排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病伴缺血的一线工具,而且可以在稳定胸痛患者进行进一步有创治疗前无创检测INOCA,影响对这类患者的准确治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信