A Simple Tool to Predict Transradial Access Fai lure for Coronary Angiography

B. Fogelson, Hassan Tahir, J. Livesay, Raj Baljepally, Usman Sarwar
{"title":"A Simple Tool to Predict Transradial Access Fai lure for Coronary Angiography","authors":"B. Fogelson, Hassan Tahir, J. Livesay, Raj Baljepally, Usman Sarwar","doi":"10.33696/cardiology.2.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on multiple large clinical trials, the transradial access (TRA) approach has been widely accepted as the preferred method of vascular access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention [1-3]. However, it is not without its limitations and complications. The major concern with the radial approach is access failure, requiring crossover to the traditional transfemoral access (TRA) approach. The rate of TRA failure requiring TFA crossover has been documented in the literature to occur in up to 11% of cases [4-7]. Unfortunately, the need for TFA crossover due to TRA failure can negatively affect patient care. For example, patients experience the discomfort associated with two needle punctures and are exposed to the potential complications of both radial and femoral artery access, which includes infection, bleeding, thrombosis, and arterial aneurysm. Additionally, TRA failure requiring TFA crossover can delay emergent coronary interventions in patients presenting with STsegment elevation myocardial infarctions, where every minute is valuable time to the myocardium [8].","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.2.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on multiple large clinical trials, the transradial access (TRA) approach has been widely accepted as the preferred method of vascular access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention [1-3]. However, it is not without its limitations and complications. The major concern with the radial approach is access failure, requiring crossover to the traditional transfemoral access (TRA) approach. The rate of TRA failure requiring TFA crossover has been documented in the literature to occur in up to 11% of cases [4-7]. Unfortunately, the need for TFA crossover due to TRA failure can negatively affect patient care. For example, patients experience the discomfort associated with two needle punctures and are exposed to the potential complications of both radial and femoral artery access, which includes infection, bleeding, thrombosis, and arterial aneurysm. Additionally, TRA failure requiring TFA crossover can delay emergent coronary interventions in patients presenting with STsegment elevation myocardial infarctions, where every minute is valuable time to the myocardium [8].
一种预测冠状动脉造影经桡动脉通路失败的简单工具
基于多个大型临床试验,经桡动脉入路(transradial access, TRA)已被广泛接受为冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的首选血管入路方法[1-3]。然而,它并非没有局限性和复杂性。桡骨入路的主要问题是入路失败,需要与传统的经股入路(TRA)交叉。据文献记载,需要TFA交叉的TRA失败率高达11%[4-7]。不幸的是,由于TRA失败而需要TFA交叉会对患者护理产生负面影响。例如,患者经历两次针头穿刺带来的不适,并暴露于桡动脉和股动脉通路的潜在并发症,包括感染、出血、血栓形成和动脉瘤。此外,对于st段抬高型心肌梗死患者,TRA失败需要TFA交叉可能会延迟紧急冠状动脉介入治疗,其中每一分钟对心肌来说都是宝贵的时间[8]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信