Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium.
Jennifer M Strahle, Rukayat Taiwo, Christine Averill, James Torner, Chevis N Shannon, Christopher M Bonfield, Gerald F Tuite, Tammy Bethel-Anderson, Jerrel Rutlin, Douglas L Brockmeyer, John C Wellons, Jeffrey R Leonard, Francesco T Mangano, James M Johnston, Manish N Shah, Bermans J Iskandar, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, David J Daniels, Eric M Jackson, Gerald A Grant, Daniel E Couture, P David Adelson, Tord D Alden, Philipp R Aldana, Richard C E Anderson, Nathan R Selden, Lissa C Baird, Karin Bierbrauer, Joshua J Chern, William E Whitehead, Richard G Ellenbogen, Herbert E Fuchs, Daniel J Guillaume, Todd C Hankinson, Mark R Iantosca, W Jerry Oakes, Robert F Keating, Nickalus R Khan, Michael S Muhlbauer, J Gordon McComb, Arnold H Menezes, John Ragheb, Jodi L Smith, Cormac O Maher, Stephanie Greene, Michael Kelly, Brent R O'Neill, Mark D Krieger, Mandeep Tamber, Susan R Durham, Greg Olavarria, Scellig S D Stone, Bruce A Kaufman, Gregory G Heuer, David F Bauer, Gregory Albert, Jeffrey P Greenfield, Scott D Wait, Mark D Van Poppel, Ramin Eskandari, Timothy Mapstone, Joshua S Shimony, Ralph G Dacey, Matthew D Smyth, Tae Sung Park, David D Limbrick
{"title":"Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium.","authors":"Jennifer M Strahle, Rukayat Taiwo, Christine Averill, James Torner, Chevis N Shannon, Christopher M Bonfield, Gerald F Tuite, Tammy Bethel-Anderson, Jerrel Rutlin, Douglas L Brockmeyer, John C Wellons, Jeffrey R Leonard, Francesco T Mangano, James M Johnston, Manish N Shah, Bermans J Iskandar, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, David J Daniels, Eric M Jackson, Gerald A Grant, Daniel E Couture, P David Adelson, Tord D Alden, Philipp R Aldana, Richard C E Anderson, Nathan R Selden, Lissa C Baird, Karin Bierbrauer, Joshua J Chern, William E Whitehead, Richard G Ellenbogen, Herbert E Fuchs, Daniel J Guillaume, Todd C Hankinson, Mark R Iantosca, W Jerry Oakes, Robert F Keating, Nickalus R Khan, Michael S Muhlbauer, J Gordon McComb, Arnold H Menezes, John Ragheb, Jodi L Smith, Cormac O Maher, Stephanie Greene, Michael Kelly, Brent R O'Neill, Mark D Krieger, Mandeep Tamber, Susan R Durham, Greg Olavarria, Scellig S D Stone, Bruce A Kaufman, Gregory G Heuer, David F Bauer, Gregory Albert, Jeffrey P Greenfield, Scott D Wait, Mark D Van Poppel, Ramin Eskandari, Timothy Mapstone, Joshua S Shimony, Ralph G Dacey, Matthew D Smyth, Tae Sung Park, David D Limbrick","doi":"10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Scoliosis is frequently a presenting sign of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) with syrinx. The authors' goal was to define scoliosis in this population and describe how radiological characteristics of CM-I and syrinx relate to the presence and severity of scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large multicenter retrospective and prospective registry of pediatric patients with CM-I (tonsils ≥ 5 mm below the foramen magnum) and syrinx (≥ 3 mm in axial width) was reviewed for clinical and radiological characteristics of CM-I, syrinx, and scoliosis (coronal curve ≥ 10°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on available imaging of patients with CM-I and syrinx, 260 of 825 patients (31%) had a clear diagnosis of scoliosis based on radiographs or coronal MRI. Forty-nine patients (5.9%) did not have scoliosis, and in 516 (63%) patients, a clear determination of the presence or absence of scoliosis could not be made. Comparison of patients with and those without a definite scoliosis diagnosis indicated that scoliosis was associated with wider syrinxes (8.7 vs 6.3 mm, OR 1.25, p < 0.001), longer syrinxes (10.3 vs 6.2 levels, OR 1.18, p < 0.001), syrinxes with their rostral extent located in the cervical spine (94% vs 80%, OR 3.91, p = 0.001), and holocord syrinxes (50% vs 16%, OR 5.61, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed syrinx length and the presence of holocord syrinx to be independent predictors of scoliosis in this patient cohort. Scoliosis was not associated with sex, age at CM-I diagnosis, tonsil position, pB-C2 distance (measured perpendicular distance from the ventral dura to a line drawn from the basion to the posterior-inferior aspect of C2), clivoaxial angle, or frontal-occipital horn ratio. Average curve magnitude was 29.9°, and 37.7% of patients had a left thoracic curve. Older age at CM-I or syrinx diagnosis (p < 0.0001) was associated with greater curve magnitude whereas there was no association between syrinx dimensions and curve magnitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Syrinx characteristics, but not tonsil position, were related to the presence of scoliosis in patients with CM-I, and there was an independent association of syrinx length and holocord syrinx with scoliosis. Further study is needed to evaluate the nature of the relationship between syrinx and scoliosis in patients with CM-I.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"520-527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Scoliosis is frequently a presenting sign of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) with syrinx. The authors' goal was to define scoliosis in this population and describe how radiological characteristics of CM-I and syrinx relate to the presence and severity of scoliosis.
Methods: A large multicenter retrospective and prospective registry of pediatric patients with CM-I (tonsils ≥ 5 mm below the foramen magnum) and syrinx (≥ 3 mm in axial width) was reviewed for clinical and radiological characteristics of CM-I, syrinx, and scoliosis (coronal curve ≥ 10°).
Results: Based on available imaging of patients with CM-I and syrinx, 260 of 825 patients (31%) had a clear diagnosis of scoliosis based on radiographs or coronal MRI. Forty-nine patients (5.9%) did not have scoliosis, and in 516 (63%) patients, a clear determination of the presence or absence of scoliosis could not be made. Comparison of patients with and those without a definite scoliosis diagnosis indicated that scoliosis was associated with wider syrinxes (8.7 vs 6.3 mm, OR 1.25, p < 0.001), longer syrinxes (10.3 vs 6.2 levels, OR 1.18, p < 0.001), syrinxes with their rostral extent located in the cervical spine (94% vs 80%, OR 3.91, p = 0.001), and holocord syrinxes (50% vs 16%, OR 5.61, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed syrinx length and the presence of holocord syrinx to be independent predictors of scoliosis in this patient cohort. Scoliosis was not associated with sex, age at CM-I diagnosis, tonsil position, pB-C2 distance (measured perpendicular distance from the ventral dura to a line drawn from the basion to the posterior-inferior aspect of C2), clivoaxial angle, or frontal-occipital horn ratio. Average curve magnitude was 29.9°, and 37.7% of patients had a left thoracic curve. Older age at CM-I or syrinx diagnosis (p < 0.0001) was associated with greater curve magnitude whereas there was no association between syrinx dimensions and curve magnitude.
Conclusions: Syrinx characteristics, but not tonsil position, were related to the presence of scoliosis in patients with CM-I, and there was an independent association of syrinx length and holocord syrinx with scoliosis. Further study is needed to evaluate the nature of the relationship between syrinx and scoliosis in patients with CM-I.
期刊介绍:
The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.