Accuracy evaluation of different statistical and geostatistical censored data imputation approaches (Case study: Sari Gunay gold deposit)

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
B. Ghane, O. Asghari
{"title":"Accuracy evaluation of different statistical and geostatistical censored data imputation approaches (Case study: Sari Gunay gold deposit)","authors":"B. Ghane, O. Asghari","doi":"10.22059/IJMGE.2016.57308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the geochemical datasets include missing data with different portions and this may cause a significant problem in geostatistical modeling or multivariate analysis of the data. Therefore, it is common to impute the missing data in most of geochemical studies. In this study, three approaches called half detection (HD), multiple imputation (MI), and the cosimulation based on Markov model 2 (MM2) are used to impute the censored data. According to the fact that the new datasets have to satisfy the original data underlying structure, the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach has been used to explore the validity of different imputation methods. Log-ratio transformation (alr transformation) was performed to open the closed compositional data prior to applying the MDS method. Experiments showed that, based on the MDS approach, the MI and the MM2 could not satisfy the original underlying structure of the dataset as well as the HD approach. This is because these two mentioned approaches have produced values higher than the detection limit of the variables.","PeriodicalId":36564,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":"49-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMGE.2016.57308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most of the geochemical datasets include missing data with different portions and this may cause a significant problem in geostatistical modeling or multivariate analysis of the data. Therefore, it is common to impute the missing data in most of geochemical studies. In this study, three approaches called half detection (HD), multiple imputation (MI), and the cosimulation based on Markov model 2 (MM2) are used to impute the censored data. According to the fact that the new datasets have to satisfy the original data underlying structure, the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach has been used to explore the validity of different imputation methods. Log-ratio transformation (alr transformation) was performed to open the closed compositional data prior to applying the MDS method. Experiments showed that, based on the MDS approach, the MI and the MM2 could not satisfy the original underlying structure of the dataset as well as the HD approach. This is because these two mentioned approaches have produced values higher than the detection limit of the variables.
不同统计与地统计截尾数据估算方法的精度评价(以Sari Gunay金矿为例)
大多数地球化学数据集都存在不同部分的缺失数据,这可能会给数据的地质统计建模或多变量分析带来重大问题。因此,在大多数地球化学研究中,普遍存在对缺失数据进行补全的现象。本文采用半检测(HD)、多重输入(MI)和基于马尔可夫模型2 (MM2)的联合模拟三种方法对截尾数据进行输入。针对新数据集必须满足原始数据底层结构的要求,采用多维尺度(MDS)方法探讨了不同数据集插值方法的有效性。在应用MDS方法之前,对封闭的成分数据进行Log-ratio变换(alr变换)打开。实验表明,基于MDS方法的MI和MM2不能像HD方法那样满足数据集的原始底层结构。这是因为上述两种方法产生的值高于变量的检测限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering
International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信