STIFENESS COMPARISON OF UNSTIFFENED AND STIFFENED T- JOINTS OF HOLLOW SECTIONS

E. Popovska, Mile Partikov, Denis Popovski
{"title":"STIFENESS COMPARISON OF UNSTIFFENED AND STIFFENED T- JOINTS OF HOLLOW SECTIONS","authors":"E. Popovska, Mile Partikov, Denis Popovski","doi":"10.55302/sjce21102065p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stiffness comparison of unstiffened and stiffened T - joints of hollow sections Structural analysis is performed on 12 models of T-joints from hollow cross sections reinforced with welded flange plate on the chord. Cross sections used for the verticals are sized from 40 to 70mm square section while the chord has size of 100mm square hollow section. For each vertical three different thickness are analyzed, also considering the thickness of the chord is same as the thickness of the vertical in the respective model. Joints are loaded with maximal in-plane bending moment. The results are drawn in a form of moment – rotation diagram and table result and compared to results obtained for same unstiffened models. Reinforcement used is based on the assumption that all the models comply with chord face failure mode, which is expected for the geometry used for these types of joints. It is concluded that the type of reinforcement is properly chosen since in all models there is an increase of the initial stiffness. Additionally, is summarized that the increase of the stiffness relies greatly of the solidness of the used sections.","PeriodicalId":30755,"journal":{"name":"Selected Scientific Papers Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selected Scientific Papers Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55302/sjce21102065p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stiffness comparison of unstiffened and stiffened T - joints of hollow sections Structural analysis is performed on 12 models of T-joints from hollow cross sections reinforced with welded flange plate on the chord. Cross sections used for the verticals are sized from 40 to 70mm square section while the chord has size of 100mm square hollow section. For each vertical three different thickness are analyzed, also considering the thickness of the chord is same as the thickness of the vertical in the respective model. Joints are loaded with maximal in-plane bending moment. The results are drawn in a form of moment – rotation diagram and table result and compared to results obtained for same unstiffened models. Reinforcement used is based on the assumption that all the models comply with chord face failure mode, which is expected for the geometry used for these types of joints. It is concluded that the type of reinforcement is properly chosen since in all models there is an increase of the initial stiffness. Additionally, is summarized that the increase of the stiffness relies greatly of the solidness of the used sections.
空心截面加筋与未加筋t形节点刚度比较
对12个空心截面加筋和未加筋T形节点模型进行了结构分析。用于垂直的横截面尺寸为40至70毫米的方形截面,而弦的尺寸为100毫米的方形空心截面。对于每个纵轴的三种不同的厚度进行了分析,同时考虑和弦的厚度与各自模型中纵轴的厚度相同。节点以最大面内弯矩加载。结果以弯矩-旋转图和表格的形式给出,并与相同的非加筋模型的结果进行了比较。使用的加固是基于所有模型都符合弦面破坏模式的假设,这是这些类型节点所使用的几何形状所期望的。结果表明,在所有模型中,初始刚度都有所增加,因此选择的加固类型是正确的。此外,还总结了刚度的增加在很大程度上取决于所用截面的固度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信