Critical Issues in the Science of Reading: Striving for a Wide-Angle View in Research

J. Hoffman, Sonia Q. Cabell, Sandra Barrueco, Etta R. Hollins, P. David Pearson
{"title":"Critical Issues in the Science of Reading: Striving for a Wide-Angle View in Research","authors":"J. Hoffman, Sonia Q. Cabell, Sandra Barrueco, Etta R. Hollins, P. David Pearson","doi":"10.1177/23813377211032195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report reflects a panel presentation and discussion at the 2020 Literacy Research Conference focused on the science of reading (SoR). Each panelist presents a summary of the presentation and incorporates the comments of the Literacy Research Association (LRA) members attending the session virtually and posting in the chat room. Each presentation takes a critical stance on the possibilities for expanding the lens for the SoR. Concerns are raised regarding the narrow interpretation of the SoR and impact of this narrow conception on research, theory, and practice.","PeriodicalId":91923,"journal":{"name":"Literacy research : theory, method, and practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"87 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy research : theory, method, and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211032195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This report reflects a panel presentation and discussion at the 2020 Literacy Research Conference focused on the science of reading (SoR). Each panelist presents a summary of the presentation and incorporates the comments of the Literacy Research Association (LRA) members attending the session virtually and posting in the chat room. Each presentation takes a critical stance on the possibilities for expanding the lens for the SoR. Concerns are raised regarding the narrow interpretation of the SoR and impact of this narrow conception on research, theory, and practice.
阅读科学中的关键问题:争取研究的广角视野
本报告反映了2020年扫盲研究会议上以阅读科学为重点的小组介绍和讨论。每个小组成员都会对演讲进行总结,并结合识字研究协会(LRA)成员的评论,这些成员参加了虚拟会议,并在聊天室发帖。每次演讲都对扩大SoR镜头的可能性提出了批评立场。对SoR的狭隘解释以及这种狭隘概念对研究、理论和实践的影响提出了关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书