Has regional disparity been reduced in Korea?:: A sectoral approach

H. Zang, Jong-soo Lee
{"title":"Has regional disparity been reduced in Korea?:: A sectoral approach","authors":"H. Zang, Jong-soo Lee","doi":"10.17256/jer.2015.20.1.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since mid-1980s, notably after the Democratization Movement in 1987, Korea had moved from an unbalanced regional development policy to a more balanced one. As the first study for Korea, this paper examines the contribution of sectors to output disparity for 15 Korea's regions for 1989-2012. The major finding is that, quite contrary to the experiences of the OECD countries presented in Bernard and Jones (1996), the services industry in Korea shows no sign of labor productivity convergence, while the manufacturing in - dustry mostly drives labor productivity divergence, leading to the aggregate non-convergence result for 1989-2012. Thus, contrary to the popular expectation, a rapid decentralization of industries did not contribute to the reduction of output disparity across Korea's regions. The potential impacts of economic liberalization realized after joining the OECD in 1996 and the aftermath of financial cri - sis in late 1997 contributed to increases in the regional disparity in Korea.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"89 1","pages":"39-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/jer.2015.20.1.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since mid-1980s, notably after the Democratization Movement in 1987, Korea had moved from an unbalanced regional development policy to a more balanced one. As the first study for Korea, this paper examines the contribution of sectors to output disparity for 15 Korea's regions for 1989-2012. The major finding is that, quite contrary to the experiences of the OECD countries presented in Bernard and Jones (1996), the services industry in Korea shows no sign of labor productivity convergence, while the manufacturing in - dustry mostly drives labor productivity divergence, leading to the aggregate non-convergence result for 1989-2012. Thus, contrary to the popular expectation, a rapid decentralization of industries did not contribute to the reduction of output disparity across Korea's regions. The potential impacts of economic liberalization realized after joining the OECD in 1996 and the aftermath of financial cri - sis in late 1997 contributed to increases in the regional disparity in Korea.
韩国的地区差距缩小了吗?*部门办法
自1980年代中期以来,特别是1987年民主化运动之后,韩国从不平衡的地区发展政策转向了更加平衡的地区发展政策。作为韩国的第一个研究,本文考察了1989-2012年韩国15个地区的部门对产出差距的贡献。主要发现是,与Bernard和Jones(1996)中OECD国家的经验相反,韩国的服务业没有表现出劳动生产率趋同的迹象,而制造业主要推动劳动生产率的分化,导致1989-2012年的总体非趋同结果。因此,与普遍的预期相反,工业的迅速分散并没有有助于减少韩国各地区的产出差距。1996年加入经济合作与发展组织(OECD)后实现的经济自由化的潜在影响和1997年末金融危机的余波,是导致地区差距扩大的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信