An Analysis of the Existence of Political Business Cycle in Nepal

Tej Prasad Devkota
{"title":"An Analysis of the Existence of Political Business Cycle in Nepal","authors":"Tej Prasad Devkota","doi":"10.3126/ejon.v44i3-4.55074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tries to analyze whether the ‘Political Business Cycle (PBC)’ exists in Nepal or not. The term PBC is coined to describe the fluctuation in economic activities from the intervention of the political actors before the election expecting to be re-elected in the forthcoming election. The abuse of political power in manipulating fiscal and monetary policies by the ruling party prior to the election period has become normal in developing countries like Nepal. The incumbent tries to convince their voters by increasing the size of the populist public expenditure before or during the election period. Nepal can’t be exceptional in the case of public resource manipulation during the time of the election. Democracy was restored in Nepal after the people’s political movement of 1990 and after that six consequent general elections were completed. The study used the annual data set from 1990/91 to 2017/18 and employed the ordinary least square method in three different models to capture the relationship among the variables used in the study. Real GDP, government consumption expenditure, and fiscal deficit are used as dependent variables of each model whereas government capital expenditure, transfer payment and subsidy, and total tax revenue are taken as independent variables under the study along with introducing election as a dummy variable. The results showed a positive relationship between the variables, but not enough to confirm the opportunistic political business cycle. The study recommends policymakers ensure policy consistency considering non-intervention in fiscal policies at the time of election.","PeriodicalId":85686,"journal":{"name":"The Economic journal of Nepal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ejon.v44i3-4.55074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper tries to analyze whether the ‘Political Business Cycle (PBC)’ exists in Nepal or not. The term PBC is coined to describe the fluctuation in economic activities from the intervention of the political actors before the election expecting to be re-elected in the forthcoming election. The abuse of political power in manipulating fiscal and monetary policies by the ruling party prior to the election period has become normal in developing countries like Nepal. The incumbent tries to convince their voters by increasing the size of the populist public expenditure before or during the election period. Nepal can’t be exceptional in the case of public resource manipulation during the time of the election. Democracy was restored in Nepal after the people’s political movement of 1990 and after that six consequent general elections were completed. The study used the annual data set from 1990/91 to 2017/18 and employed the ordinary least square method in three different models to capture the relationship among the variables used in the study. Real GDP, government consumption expenditure, and fiscal deficit are used as dependent variables of each model whereas government capital expenditure, transfer payment and subsidy, and total tax revenue are taken as independent variables under the study along with introducing election as a dummy variable. The results showed a positive relationship between the variables, but not enough to confirm the opportunistic political business cycle. The study recommends policymakers ensure policy consistency considering non-intervention in fiscal policies at the time of election.
尼泊尔政治经济周期的存在分析
本文试图分析尼泊尔是否存在“政治经济周期”。“PBC”一词是用来描述由于预期在即将到来的选举中再次当选的政治行为者在选举前的干预而导致的经济活动波动。执政党在选举前滥用政治权力操纵财政和货币政策,在尼泊尔等发展中国家已经成为常态。在任者试图通过在选举前或选举期间增加民粹主义公共开支的规模来说服选民。在选举期间公共资源被操纵的情况下,尼泊尔也不例外。尼泊尔在1990年的人民政治运动之后恢复了民主,随后举行了六次大选。本研究使用1990/91年至2017/18年的年度数据集,并在三个不同的模型中使用普通最小二乘法来捕捉研究中使用的变量之间的关系。各模型分别以实际GDP、政府消费支出和财政赤字为因变量,以政府资本支出、转移支付和补贴、税收总额为自变量,并引入选举作为虚拟变量。结果显示变量之间存在正相关关系,但不足以证实机会主义政治商业周期。该研究建议政策制定者在选举时考虑到财政政策的不干预,确保政策的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信